摘要
解释“后真相”主要有两种语境:西方语境与中国语境。在西方语境下,以2016年英国脱欧与美国总统选举为典型的“后真相”现象的实质为政治问题。在中国语境下,以网络舆论反转为典型的“后真相”现象的实质为社会问题。作为社会问题的“后真相”现象,行动逻辑不在于“无社会共识”,而在于“规避社会责任意识”与“难以归责的预期”的驱动。基于此,探索事物真相可能会陷入自由主义、多元主义及技术主义的陷阱。为避免陷入“后真相”的陷阱,应建立以责任为基础的真相供给体系、公开透明的真相叙述体系及忠实于事实的真相技术体系。
There are two main contexts to explain“post-truth”:Western context and Chinese context.In the Western context,the essence of the“post-truth”phenomenon,which is represented by 2016 Brexit and the US presidential election,is a political issue.In the Chinese context,the essence of the“post-truth”phenomenon is a social issue,with Internet public opinion reversal being a typical case.The action logic of the“post-truth”phenomenon as a social issue does not lie in“no social consensus,”but is driven by“the avoidance of social responsibility consciousness”and“unaccountable expectations.”On this basis,searching for truth may fall into the trap of liberalism,pluralism,and technicism.To avoid falling into the trap of“posttruth,”we should establish a truth supply system based on responsibility,an open and transparent truth narrative system,and a truth technology system that is faithful to the truth.
作者
黄爱教
HUANG Ai-jiao(School of Marxism,TianGong University,Tianjin 300387,China)
出处
《前沿》
2023年第4期76-84,共9页
Forward Position
基金
教育部人文社会科学研究规划项目“中国共产党促进机会平等的政策体系研究”(22YJAZH029)
关键词
后真相
网络舆论
社会责任意识
真相供给
post-truth
network public opinion
social responsibility consciousness
truth supply
