The judicial application of digital evidence in criminal cases(criminal digital evidence)is an inevitable trend for the digital transformation of criminal proceedings in the macro context of the digital economy.It is ...The judicial application of digital evidence in criminal cases(criminal digital evidence)is an inevitable trend for the digital transformation of criminal proceedings in the macro context of the digital economy.It is characterized by digitization,diversification,and traceability.The application of criminal digital evidence can be divided into two main scenarios:the vertical scenario involving phases such as filing,prosecution,and trial;the horizontal scenario related to specific types of crimes.Criminal digital evidence is primarily applied to handling non-contact crimes,such as cybercrimes.However,the application of such evidence may infringe upon the basic rights of suspects,including their rights to privacy,rights to know,and rights to defense.Furthermore,the diversified and non-systematic nature of digital evidence may lead to challenges in applying the law,particularly with algorithmic“black boxes,”which can result in judicial discrimination and other drawbacks.Therefore,it is necessary to formulate or improve the regulatory framework for criminal digital evidence to ensure its lawful and standardized application.Additionally,judicial authorities must strengthen collaboration in case handling to ensure smooth coordination in collecting and applying digital evidence,thereby realizing its efficient litigation value.Furthermore,it is essential to check and balance the algorithm-based conviction and sentencing to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the parties involved,achieving high-quality human rights protection.展开更多
Online criminal litigation transcends the constraints of physical time and space and changes the logic and path of trial hearings for some criminal cases with the help of technology.However,the leapfrog shift from the...Online criminal litigation transcends the constraints of physical time and space and changes the logic and path of trial hearings for some criminal cases with the help of technology.However,the leapfrog shift from the“physical field”to the“virtual field”has brought great challenges to the effective exercise of the defendant's right to defense.Online criminal justice further highlights the imbalance in the relationship between prosecution and defense in the context of smart justice,and proposes a new topic for protecting the human rights of the prosecuted.The introduction of online criminal litigation in judicial practice is intended to achieve justice in a faster and more convenient way.However,the dissipation of the ritualized remote hearings tends to undermine the effectiveness of the defense and impair the defense's ability to cross-examine evidence,while the technically advantageous public authorities can aggravate the barrier to the defense's meeting and reading the case file.The root cause is that technological power instrumentalism overemphasizes pragmatism and the pursuit of truth under the position of authority,thus diluting humanistic care for the subject of litigation.In order to resolve the problem with the quality and effectiveness of the right to defense in remote hearings,it is necessary to transform online criminal litigation from a“practical technical tool”to a“convenient auxiliary method,”and appropriately weigh the limits of pursuing truth against human rights protection in special scenarios.Meanwhile,it is also feasible to provide technical care for the defense and strengthen its ability to cross-examine evidence.Moreover,a covert communication platform should be furnished for the defender's online meeting to actively strengthen the protection of the defendant's right to defense.展开更多
The task of prison term prediction is to predict the term of penalty based on textual fact description for a certain type of criminal case.Recent advances in deep learning frameworks inspire us to propose a two-step m...The task of prison term prediction is to predict the term of penalty based on textual fact description for a certain type of criminal case.Recent advances in deep learning frameworks inspire us to propose a two-step method to address this problem.To obtain a better understanding and more specific representation of the legal texts,we summarize a judgment model according to relevant law articles and then apply it in the extraction of case feature from judgment documents.By formalizing prison term prediction as a regression problem,we adopt the linear regression model and the neural network model to train the prison term predictor.In experiments,we construct a real-world dataset of theft case judgment documents.Experimental results demonstrate that our method can effectively extract judgment-specific case features from textual fact descriptions.The best performance of the proposed predictor is obtained with a mean absolute error of 3.2087 months,and the accuracy of 72.54%and 90.01%at the error upper bounds of three and six months,respectively.展开更多
Blockchain,artificial intelligence,and other technologies have been increasingly integrated with the law,and the construction of smart justice and Internet courts in various places has a prominent effect on court info...Blockchain,artificial intelligence,and other technologies have been increasingly integrated with the law,and the construction of smart justice and Internet courts in various places has a prominent effect on court informatization.The Supreme People’s Court is currently carrying out the pilot reform of separation between complicated and simple cases in civil procedure,and legal technology will inevitably become a major means to enable the reform.In the field of electronic litigation,legal technology itself has become a goal of the reform.Regarding the trials of pilot basic courts,legal technology has been more deeply applied in many links such as trial activities and trial management,playing an essential role in improving judicial efficiency,and becoming an important way to solve judicial dilemmas such as“litigation explosion.”However,the history of modern society reminds us that we should be reasonably optimistic about the development of technology,especially in the field of justice.展开更多
文摘The judicial application of digital evidence in criminal cases(criminal digital evidence)is an inevitable trend for the digital transformation of criminal proceedings in the macro context of the digital economy.It is characterized by digitization,diversification,and traceability.The application of criminal digital evidence can be divided into two main scenarios:the vertical scenario involving phases such as filing,prosecution,and trial;the horizontal scenario related to specific types of crimes.Criminal digital evidence is primarily applied to handling non-contact crimes,such as cybercrimes.However,the application of such evidence may infringe upon the basic rights of suspects,including their rights to privacy,rights to know,and rights to defense.Furthermore,the diversified and non-systematic nature of digital evidence may lead to challenges in applying the law,particularly with algorithmic“black boxes,”which can result in judicial discrimination and other drawbacks.Therefore,it is necessary to formulate or improve the regulatory framework for criminal digital evidence to ensure its lawful and standardized application.Additionally,judicial authorities must strengthen collaboration in case handling to ensure smooth coordination in collecting and applying digital evidence,thereby realizing its efficient litigation value.Furthermore,it is essential to check and balance the algorithm-based conviction and sentencing to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the parties involved,achieving high-quality human rights protection.
基金the phased result of the Humanities and Social Science Research and Planning Fund Project of the Ministry of Education,titled“Research on Online Dispute Resolution Mechanisms:Theory,Rules,and Practice”(22YJA820036)Research Project on the Historical and Cultural Heritage,Essential Connotation and Mission of the Era of China’s Human Rights Development Path of the Beijing Research Center of Xi Jinping Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era(23LLFXA055)。
文摘Online criminal litigation transcends the constraints of physical time and space and changes the logic and path of trial hearings for some criminal cases with the help of technology.However,the leapfrog shift from the“physical field”to the“virtual field”has brought great challenges to the effective exercise of the defendant's right to defense.Online criminal justice further highlights the imbalance in the relationship between prosecution and defense in the context of smart justice,and proposes a new topic for protecting the human rights of the prosecuted.The introduction of online criminal litigation in judicial practice is intended to achieve justice in a faster and more convenient way.However,the dissipation of the ritualized remote hearings tends to undermine the effectiveness of the defense and impair the defense's ability to cross-examine evidence,while the technically advantageous public authorities can aggravate the barrier to the defense's meeting and reading the case file.The root cause is that technological power instrumentalism overemphasizes pragmatism and the pursuit of truth under the position of authority,thus diluting humanistic care for the subject of litigation.In order to resolve the problem with the quality and effectiveness of the right to defense in remote hearings,it is necessary to transform online criminal litigation from a“practical technical tool”to a“convenient auxiliary method,”and appropriately weigh the limits of pursuing truth against human rights protection in special scenarios.Meanwhile,it is also feasible to provide technical care for the defense and strengthen its ability to cross-examine evidence.Moreover,a covert communication platform should be furnished for the defender's online meeting to actively strengthen the protection of the defendant's right to defense.
基金This work is supported in part by the National Key Research and Development Program of China under grants 2018YFC0830602 and 2016QY03D0501in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(NSFC)under grants 61872111,61732022 and 61601146.
文摘The task of prison term prediction is to predict the term of penalty based on textual fact description for a certain type of criminal case.Recent advances in deep learning frameworks inspire us to propose a two-step method to address this problem.To obtain a better understanding and more specific representation of the legal texts,we summarize a judgment model according to relevant law articles and then apply it in the extraction of case feature from judgment documents.By formalizing prison term prediction as a regression problem,we adopt the linear regression model and the neural network model to train the prison term predictor.In experiments,we construct a real-world dataset of theft case judgment documents.Experimental results demonstrate that our method can effectively extract judgment-specific case features from textual fact descriptions.The best performance of the proposed predictor is obtained with a mean absolute error of 3.2087 months,and the accuracy of 72.54%and 90.01%at the error upper bounds of three and six months,respectively.
文摘Blockchain,artificial intelligence,and other technologies have been increasingly integrated with the law,and the construction of smart justice and Internet courts in various places has a prominent effect on court informatization.The Supreme People’s Court is currently carrying out the pilot reform of separation between complicated and simple cases in civil procedure,and legal technology will inevitably become a major means to enable the reform.In the field of electronic litigation,legal technology itself has become a goal of the reform.Regarding the trials of pilot basic courts,legal technology has been more deeply applied in many links such as trial activities and trial management,playing an essential role in improving judicial efficiency,and becoming an important way to solve judicial dilemmas such as“litigation explosion.”However,the history of modern society reminds us that we should be reasonably optimistic about the development of technology,especially in the field of justice.
