期刊文献+

The Carbon Sinks and Mitigation Potential of Deodar (<i>Cedrus deodara</i>) Forest Ecosystem at Different Altitude in Kumrat Valley, Pakistan

The Carbon Sinks and Mitigation Potential of Deodar (<i>Cedrus deodara</i>) Forest Ecosystem at Different Altitude in Kumrat Valley, Pakistan
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 Forest carbon monitoring and reporting are critical for informing global climate change assessment. The regional estimates of forest carbon attached greater attention, to assess the role of forest in carbon mitigation. Here using field inventory, we examined the carbon sink and mitigation potential of monospecific Deodar forest in the Kumrat valley, of Hindu Kush Himalaya, Region of Pakistan, at a different elevation. The elevation of monospecific Deodar forest ranges from 2300 to 2700 m (a.s.l). We divided the forest into three elevation classes (that is 2300 - 2400 m (EI) 2400 - 2500 m (EII) and 2500 - 2700 m (EIII) a.s.l respectively). In each elevation class, we laid out 09 sample plots (33*33 m2) for measuring carbon values in living tree biomass (LT), soil (SC), litter, dead wood, cone (LDWC) and understory vegetation (USV). Our results showed that the carbon density at EI was 432.37 ± 277.96 Mg·C-1, while the carbon density at EII and EIII was 668.35 ± 323.94 and 1016.79 ± 542.99 Mg·C-1 respectively. Our finding revealed that the carbon mitigation potential of the forest increases with increasing elevation. Among the different elevation classes, EIII stored significantly higher carbon due to the dominance of mature, old age, larger trees, and the minimum anthropogenic disturbance, whereas EI stored statistically lower carbon because of maximum anthropogenic disturbance, which resulted in the removal of mature and over-mature trees. Furthermore, our correlation analysis between tree height and carbon stock and basal area and LT carbon, underlines that the basal area is the stronger predictor of LT carbon estimation than height. Overall our results highlight that deodar forest stored 716.94 ± 462.06 Mg?C·ha-1. However, the rehabilitation, preservation and sustainable management of disturb forest located at a lower elevation could considerably improve carbon mitigation potential. Forest carbon monitoring and reporting are critical for informing global climate change assessment. The regional estimates of forest carbon attached greater attention, to assess the role of forest in carbon mitigation. Here using field inventory, we examined the carbon sink and mitigation potential of monospecific Deodar forest in the Kumrat valley, of Hindu Kush Himalaya, Region of Pakistan, at a different elevation. The elevation of monospecific Deodar forest ranges from 2300 to 2700 m (a.s.l). We divided the forest into three elevation classes (that is 2300 - 2400 m (EI) 2400 - 2500 m (EII) and 2500 - 2700 m (EIII) a.s.l respectively). In each elevation class, we laid out 09 sample plots (33*33 m2) for measuring carbon values in living tree biomass (LT), soil (SC), litter, dead wood, cone (LDWC) and understory vegetation (USV). Our results showed that the carbon density at EI was 432.37 ± 277.96 Mg·C-1, while the carbon density at EII and EIII was 668.35 ± 323.94 and 1016.79 ± 542.99 Mg·C-1 respectively. Our finding revealed that the carbon mitigation potential of the forest increases with increasing elevation. Among the different elevation classes, EIII stored significantly higher carbon due to the dominance of mature, old age, larger trees, and the minimum anthropogenic disturbance, whereas EI stored statistically lower carbon because of maximum anthropogenic disturbance, which resulted in the removal of mature and over-mature trees. Furthermore, our correlation analysis between tree height and carbon stock and basal area and LT carbon, underlines that the basal area is the stronger predictor of LT carbon estimation than height. Overall our results highlight that deodar forest stored 716.94 ± 462.06 Mg?C·ha-1. However, the rehabilitation, preservation and sustainable management of disturb forest located at a lower elevation could considerably improve carbon mitigation potential.
出处 《Open Journal of Forestry》 2018年第4期553-566,共14页 林学期刊(英文)
关键词 Deodar Forest Elevation Carbon SINKS MITIGATION POTENTIAL Deodar Forest Elevation Carbon Sinks Mitigation Potential
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献36

  • 1Anderson JM, Ingram JSl. 1993. Tropical Soil Fertility: A handbook ofmethods. Wallingford. U.K: CAB, pp. 68-71.
  • 2Bakker JP, Olff H, Willems JH, Zobel M. 1996. Wby do we need permanent plots in the study oflong-term vegetation dynamics? Journal of Vegetation Science,7; 147-156.
  • 3Bell G. 2000. Environmental heterogeneity and species diversity of forest edges. Journal of Ecology, 88: 67-87.
  • 4Birkeland PW. 1984. Soils and Geomorphology. New York: Oxford Univ. Press, p.372.
  • 5Brown S, Lugo AE. 1982. The storage and production of organic matter in tropical forests and their role in the global carbon cycle. Biotropica, 14: 161-187.
  • 6Cairns MA, Brown S, Helmer EH, Baumgardner GA. 1997. Root biomass allocation in the world upland forest. Oecologia, 111: 1-11.
  • 7Chaturvedi OP, Singh JS. 1982. Total biomass and biomass production in Pinus roxburghii trees growing in all aged natural forests. Can J For Res, 12: 632-640.
  • 8Dixon RK, Brown S, Houghton RA, Solomon AM, Trexler MC, Wisniewski J. 1994. Carbon pool and fluxes of global forest ecosystem. Science, 263: 185-190.
  • 9FAO. 2006. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2005 - Progress towards Sustainable Forest Management. FAO Forestry PaperNo. 147.
  • 10Herzog M. 1998. Shrubland Management in Tribal Islamic Yemen. Social Forestry as Development ofa Local and Sustainable (Sylvi) Culture-An Essay in Practical Philosophy. Rheinfelden, Switzerland.

共引文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部