期刊文献+

康德的“崇高”与先秦“大”美之比较

A Comparison between Kant’s “Sublime” and Pre-Qin’s “Great” Beauty
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 “崇高”是典型的西方审美范畴,康德的“崇高论”代表了西方的“崇高”观念的经典内涵。中国古典美学没有“崇高”的概念,但却有与之相似的表达“大”美的概念,并且中华文化最具代表性的儒道两家都对“大”美有着深刻的阐释。本文旨在比较康德的“崇高”和我国先秦儒道的“大”美之异同,从而对中西方不同的审美文化观念进行深入理解。 “Sublime” is a typical western aesthetic category, and Kant’s “sublime theory” represents the classical connotation of the western concept of “sublime”. There is no concept of “sublime” in Chinese classical aesthetics, but there is a similar concept of expressing “great” beauty, and the most representative Confucian and Taoist schools of Chinese culture have a profound interpretation of “great” beauty. The purpose of this paper is to compare the “sublime” of Kant with the “great” beauty of pre-Qin Confucianism and Taoism in China, so as to deeply understand the different aesthetic cultural concepts of China and the West.
作者 徐甜甜
出处 《哲学进展》 2024年第1期1-6,共6页 Advances in Philosophy
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献1

  • 1[宋]朱熹.四书集注[M].长沙:岳麓书社,1987..

共引文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部