期刊文献+

我国货币增长率对实际产出的长期影响

On the Long-term Effect of M2 Growth on Real Output
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 在检验出货币供应量M2为I(2),实际产出为I(1)之后,再用一个只包含M2的增长率、实际产出两变量的二元结构向量自回归模型来研究1962~2002年期间货币供应量增长率的一次永久性变化对实际产出的长期影响,结果表明,在中国存在Tobin效应,即货币供应量M2增长率的一次永久性增加使实际产出增加,货币长期超中性不成立。 Having tested that M2 is I(2) and real output is I(2), a structural vector autoregression framework is used to analyze the effect of a permanent change in China's money growth rate on the long-term real output level from 1962 to 2002. The result shows that there exists Tobin effect in China, which indicates that a permanent increase in money growth rate increases the long-term real output in China and the long-term real super neutrality is rejected.
作者 钱士春
出处 《山西财经大学学报》 北大核心 2004年第2期33-37,共5页 Journal of Shanxi University of Finance and Economics
关键词 I(2) 结构向量自回归 货币长期超中性 Tobin效应 I(2) structural vector autoregression super neutrality Tobin effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Blanchard, O.J. and D. Quah. The Dynamic Effects of Aggregate Demand and Supply disturbances[J]. American Economic Review,1989,79(4) :655 - 673.
  • 2CarlE Walsh.货币理论与政策[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2001..
  • 3Cooley, T.F. and G..D. Hansen.he Inflation Tax in a Real Business Cycle Model[J]. American Economic Review, 1989,79: (4),733 - 748.
  • 4David E. Bapach .International Evidence on the Long-run Impact of Inflation[J] .Working Paper,2000.
  • 5Flliott, G., T.J. Rothenberg, and J.H. Stock Efficient tests for an autoregressive unit root[J].Econometrica, 1996,64(4):813-836.
  • 6Eric Zivot and Donlad W. K. Andrews. Further Evidence on the Great Crash,the Oil- price Shock and the Unit- root Hypothesis[J].Journal of Business &Economic statistics, 1992.
  • 7Fisher, M.E. and J.J. Seater. Long- Run Neutrality and Superneutrality in an ARIMA framework[J] .American Economic Review,1993,83(3) :402 - 415.
  • 8Hansen, B.E. Testing for Structural Change in Conditional Models[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 2000,97 (1): 93 - 115.
  • 9李晓荣,王宪良.我国货币长期中性的实证研究[J].西安石油学院学报(社会科学版),2003,12(2):19-24. 被引量:6
  • 10周锦林.关于我国货币“中性”问题的实证研究[J].经济科学,2002(1):61-65. 被引量:50

二级参考文献13

  • 1[2]王国维.计量经济学[M].大连:东北财经大学出版社,2002.
  • 2Bernd, H. 1999. Money-Output Granger Causality Revisited: An Empirical Analysis of EU Countries. Applied Economics.
  • 3Boudjdlaba, H,and J, M. Dufour, and R. Roy, 1994. simplified conditions for Noncausality Between Vectors in Multivariate Arma Models, Journal of Econometrics, 63.
  • 4Friedman, B, and N. K. Kenneth. 1992. Money, Income, Prices, and Interest Rates. American Economic Review 57,189-203.
  • 5Hafer, R. W. and G. S. Richard, 1991. Policy Inference Using VAR Models, the Effects of Alternative Lag structures. Economic Inquiry,44-52.
  • 6Hafer, R. and A. M. Kutan 1997,More Evidence on The Money-Output Relationship, Economic Inquiry, 35.
  • 7Rudebusch,G. D. 1993. The Uncertsin Unit Root in Real GNP. American Economic Review, March, 265- 272.
  • 8Sims, C. A. 1972. Money,Income and Causality. American Economic Review, 62,4:540-542.
  • 9Sims, C. A. 1980. Comparison of Interwar and Postwar Business Cycles. American Economic REview, 70,2 : 250-257.
  • 10Stock, J. H. and M. W. Watson. 1989. Interpreting the Evidence on Money-Income Causality. Journal of Econometrics, 40,1:161-181.

共引文献55

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部