摘要
目的:探讨微创内固定(MIPPO)技术与切开复位钢板内固定(ORIF)治疗胫骨远端骨折的不同临床效果。方法:2011年3月-2013年3月收治胫骨远端骨折患者60例,随机分为MIPPO组与ORIF组,分别给予微创内固定技术治疗及切开复位钢板内固定技术治疗,对比两组的疗效。结果:在手术用时、骨折恢复时间等指标上,MIPPO组优于ORIF组,术中出血量低于ORIF组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后ORIF组恢复效果差,并发症发生率显著高于MIPPO组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:MIPPO为治疗胫骨远端骨折的一种安全、实用性高的技术,优于ORIP技术,值得在临床上应用推广。
Objective:To explore the different clinical effects of minimally invasive internal fixation(MIPPO) technology and open reduction plate internal fixation in the treatment of distal tibial fracture.Methods:60 patients with distal tibial fracture were selected from March 2011 to March 2013.They were randomly divided into MIPPO group and ORIF group.They were respectively given minimally invasive internal fixation technology treatment and open reduction plate fixation technology treatment.The curative effects of two groups were compared.Results:In operation time,fracture healing time and other indicators,MIPPO group was better than ORIF group;the intraoperative blood loss was lower than that of ORIF group;the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).After operation,ORIF group recovery effect was poor;the occurrence rate of complications was significantly higher than that of MIPPO group;the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:MIPPO is a safe,high practicability technology for the treatment of distal tibial fracture,and it is better than ORIP technology.It is worth of clinical application.
出处
《中国社区医师》
2015年第7期29-30,共2页
Chinese Community Doctors
