摘要
洹北商城发现以来,学界对这座中商时期王都的性质给予了莫大的关注,就近二十余年的研究来看,'盘庚殷都说'、'河亶甲相都说'、'河亶甲居相与盘庚迁殷相继发生之地说'是三种支持者最多、却长期以来难以达成共识的见解。这些观点如何产生、相关学者的立论依据是什么,是值得梳理、回顾与思考的。随着考古发掘的继续与研究的深入,这座商城的性质将更加清晰。
Since the Shang city of Huanbei was found, the nature of this capital city dated to midShang period were paid attention by scholars. More than 20 years’ research suggests that Pangeng’s capital city 'Yin',Hedanjia’s capital city 'Xiang',Yin after Xiang theory gained most supporters, but scholars failed to reach a consensus opinion for a long time. How these views come into being and what are the bases of the relevant scholars? As the archaeological excavation continues and the research deepens, the nature of this Shang city will become clearer.
作者
郭荣臻
Guo Rongzhen(The School of History and Culture,Shandong University,jinan,250100)
出处
《文物建筑》
2018年第1期82-95,共14页
Traditional Architecture
关键词
洹北商城
盘庚迁殷
河亶甲居相
学术史
考古
The Shang city of Huanbei
Pangeng’s capital city'Yin'
Hedanjia’s capital city'Xiang'
academic history
archaeology
