期刊文献+

共治理念下阶段性康复训练联合渐进性放松训练对腰椎间盘突出症患者术后康复的影响

Effect of Phased Rehabilitation Training Combined with Progressive Relaxation Training Under the Concept of Co-Treatment on Rehabilitation of Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation after Surgery
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨共治理念下阶段性康复训练联合渐进性放松训练对腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)患者术后康复的影响。方法:选择2023年1-12月赤峰市医院收治的80例LDH术后患者为研究对象,按随机数字表法将其分为对照组及观察组,各40例。对照组采用常规康复护理干预,观察组采用共治理念下阶段性康复训练联合渐进性放松训练,两组均持续干预8周。比较两组康复依从性、疼痛程度、肌肉耐力、腰椎功能及并发症发生情况。结果:干预后,观察组的锻炼效果监管、主动寻求意见及身体参与锻炼依从性评分均高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。干预后,观察组的腰部疼痛视觉模拟(VAS)评分及腿部VAS评分均低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。干预后,观察组的腹肌耐力及背肌耐力评分均低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。干预后,观察组的日本骨科协会腰椎功能评分高于对照组,Osweatry功能障碍评分低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组的并发症发生率为5.00%,低于对照组的20.00%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:共治理念下阶段性康复训练联合渐进性放松训练可提高LDH患者术后的康复锻炼依从性,减轻腰腿疼痛,增强肌肉耐力,改善腰椎功能,减少并发症,具有临床应用价值。 Objective:To explore the effect of phased rehabilitation training combined with progressive relaxation training under the concept of co-treatment on rehabilitation of patients with lumbar disc herniation(LDH)after surgery.Methods:A total of 80 postoperative patients with LDH admitted to Chifeng Hospital from January to December 2023 were selected as the study objects,and were divided into a control group and an observation group according to random number table method,with 40 cases in each group.The control group received routine rehabilitation nursing intervention,and the observation group received phased rehabilitation training combined with progressive relaxation training under the concept of co-treatment.Both groups continued the intervention for 8 weeks.The rehabilitation compliance,pain degree,muscle endurance,lumbar function and complications were compared between the two groups.Results:After intervention,the compliance scores of exercise effect supervision,active advice seeking and physical participation in the observation group were higher than those in the control group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).After intervention,the lower back pain visual analogue scale(VAS)score and leg pain VAS score of the observation group were lower than those of the control group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).After intervention,the abdominal muscle endurance and back muscle endurance scores of the observation group were lower than those of the control group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).After intervention,the Japanese Orthopaedic Association lumbar function score of the observation group was higher than that of the control group,and the Oswestry disability index score was lower than that of the control group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The incidence of complications in the observation group was 5.00%,which was lower than 20.00%in the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:Phased rehabilitation training combined with progressive relaxation training under the concept of co-treatment can improve the compliance of rehabilitation exercise in patients with LDH after surgery,reduce back and leg pain,enhance muscle endurance,improve lumbar function,reduce complications,and have clinical application value.
作者 张静 王杰 ZHANG Jing;WANG Jie(Department of Spine Surgery,Chifeng Municipal Hospital,Chifeng 243000,China)
出处 《中国伤残医学》 2024年第19期138-142,共5页 Chinese Journal of Trauma and Disability Medicine
关键词 腰椎间盘突出症 共治理念 阶段性康复训练 渐进性放松训练 疼痛 腰椎功能 Lumbar disc herniation Concept of co-treatment Phased rehabilitation training Progressive relaxation training Pain Lumbar function
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献136

  • 1田宝鹏,林欣.腰椎间盘突出症手术疗效探讨[J].中国康复理论与实践,2005,11(12):1039-1040. 被引量:12
  • 2王沛,郭世绂.腰骶神经通道和腰骶神经根病的发病学[J].中华骨科杂志,1996,16(12):796-798. 被引量:37
  • 3Jin K,Sorock GS,Courtney T,et al.Risk factors for work-related low back pain in the People's Republic of China [J].Int J Occup Environ Health,2000,6(1):26-33.
  • 4Fairbank JC,Pynsent PB.The Oswestry disability index[J].Spine, 2000,25:2940-2952.
  • 5Fischer D,Stewart AL,Bloch DA,et al.Capturing the patient's view of change as a clinical outcome measure [J].JAMA, 1999,282(12):1157-1162.
  • 6van der Putten JJ,Hobart JC,Freeman JA,et al.Measuring change in disability after inpatient rehabilitation:comparison of the responsiveness of the Barthel index and the Functional independence Measure [J].J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 1999,66(4):480-484.
  • 7Wells G,Beaton D,Shea B,et al.Minimal clinical important differences:review of methods[J].J Rheumatol,2001,28:406-412.
  • 8Campbell H,Rivero-Arias O,Johnston K,et al.Responsiveness of objective,disease-specific,and generic outcome measures in patients with chronic low back pain:an assessment for improving,stable,and deteriorating patients [J].Spine,2006,31(7): 815-822.
  • 9Coelho RA,Siqueira FB,Ferreira PH,et al.Responsiveness of the Brazilian-Portuguese version of the Oswestry Disability Index in subjects with low back pain [J].Eur Spine J,2008,17(8): 1101-1106.
  • 10Hashimoto H,Komagata M,Nakai O,et al.Diseriminative validity and responsiveness of the Oswestry Disability Index among Japanese outpatients with lumbar conditions [J].Eur Spine J, 2006,15(11):1645-1650.

共引文献3228

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部