摘要
加入CPTPP进程中,我国国有企业公司治理在该框架下面临挑战:公权力嵌入公司治理边界不清,“出资人”出资权和管理权利益实现不明确,从而可能和授受CPTPP框架下被禁止的“非商业援助”挂钩;问责监督程序缺失或不完善,以及透明度尚待提高等情形均可能被界定为破坏“竞争中性”。统筹视野下,OECD长期以来一直致力于通过发布指引性文件,对“竞争中性”和国有企业公司治理进行比较全面的示范性规则指引。鉴于CPTPP缔约方不少都属于OECD成员,OECD的指引性文件对CPTPP的影响不容忽视。我国在加入谈判和国内实践两方面均可借鉴其相应文件,完善对国有企业的治理模式并分类施策,从而积极主动与CPTPP做好规则对标。
In the process of joining the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partner-ship(CPTPP),the corporate governance of China's state-owned enterprises(SOEs)is facing certain challenges under this framework.For example,the unclear boundaries of public power embedded in corporate governance and the ambiguous delineation of the interests regarding rights to capital contribution and management of"investors"may be linked to"non-commercial assistance"prohibited under the CPTPP framework.Additionally,the absence or inadequacy of accountability and supervision procedures,coupled with the need to improve transparency,may be construed as undermining"competitive neutrality."Under the perspective of integration,the Organisation for Eco-nomic Co-operation and Development(OECD)has long been committed to providing comprehensive exemplary rule guidance on"competitive neutrality"and the corporate governance of SOEs through the issuance of guiding documents.Since many CPTPP parties are members of the OECD,the impact of the OECD's guidance documents on the CPTPP cannot be ignored.China can draw on these documents in both the accession negotiation and domes-tic practice to improve the governance mode of SOEs and implement targeted policies,thereby actively aligning with the CPTPP rules.
作者
李本
LI Ben(Shanghai University)
出处
《国际贸易》
CSSCI
北大核心
2024年第12期82-92,共11页
Intertrade
基金
2022年度国家社科基金重点项目“中国国有企业与CPTPP法律规则对接研究”(22AFX020)的阶段性成果。
关键词
国有企业
公司治理
CPTPP
OECD
竞争中性
state-owned enterprises
corporate governance
CPTPP
OECD
competitive neutrality
