摘要
基于自然化的“功能”概念来处理道德责任问题是颇为切合当代主流世界观的一种进路。沿着这一思路,晓非就“否决功能如何说明自主行为中的自由感”“如何基于功能式同一性标准应对操纵难题”与“‘功能规范型’模型如何说明道德归责的规范性”等问题展开了颇有新意的探讨。围绕这三个主题,还需要进一步探讨以下观点:升级版的否决功能假说本身存在着削弱自由感的风险;借助功能同一性标准的思路切中了操纵难题的一个当代启示,即公正的归责需要清晰锁定表面行动背后的核心决策来源;当前版本的“功能规范型”归责理论尚未彻底摆脱实用主义困境。
Approaching the issue of moral responsibility on the basis of the naturalized concept of“function”is a way forward that is quite fit in with the contemporary mainstream worldview.Three key points of arguments from the concept of“function”are focused in Xiaofei’s discussion about moral responsibility:firstly,“how the veto function hypothesis accounts for the sense of freedom in autonomous behavior”;secondly,“how to deal with the manipulation problem based on the criterion of the functional identity”;and finally,“how the‘function based normative theory’illustrates the resource of normativity in practices of ascribing responsibility”.Along with these points,this paper attempts to argue that:the upgraded version of the veto function hypothesis inherently includes risk in undermining the feeling of freedom;the idea of drawing on the criterion of functional identity hits the heart of the contemporary revelation of the manipulation problem,namely,that just ascription of responsibility requires a clear targeting of the core sources of decision-making behind the apparent action.The current version of the“functional normativeness”theory of moral responsibility has not yet managed to escape the pragmatic dilemma completely.
出处
《哲学分析》
CSSCI
北大核心
2024年第5期109-121,198,199,共15页
Philosophical Analysis
基金
湖南省社会科学成果评审委员会课题“免责性无知条件研究”(项目编号:XSP20YBC404)
湖南省社科办智库专项课题“湖南省迈向‘生态强省’发展对策研究”(项目编号:18ZWC18)。
关键词
道德责任
自由感
操纵难题
功能规范型归责理论
moral responsibility
function
the sense of freedom
the manipulation problem
function-based normative theory of ascribing responsibility
