期刊文献+

不同频率电针治疗紫杉类化疗药物所致周围神经病变:随机对照试验 被引量:3

Electroacupuncture with different frequencies for paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy:a randomized controlled trial
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:观察2 Hz、100 Hz、2 Hz/100 Hz不同频率电针治疗紫杉类化疗药物所致周围神经病变(CIPN的临床疗效。方法:将160例女性乳腺癌采用紫杉类化疗药物所致CIPN患者随机分为2 Hz电针组(40例,脱落1例)、100 Hz电针组(40例,脱落2例)、2 Hz/100 Hz电针组(40例,脱落3例)及西药组(40例,脱落2例)。3个电针组均于双侧曲池、外关、合谷、足三里、阳陵泉等穴进行针刺,同侧合谷与外关、足三里与三阴交分别连接HANS-200E型韩氏穴位神经刺激仪电极,分别予频率2 Hz、100 Hz及2 Hz/100 Hz电针刺激,每次30 min,隔日1次,每周治疗3次。西药组予口服甲钴胺片治疗,每次0.5 mg,每天3次。各组均连续治疗4周。于治疗前、治疗后及全部治疗结束后4周随访,观察各组肿瘤患者神经毒性评估量表(FACT/GOG-Ntx)评分、美国国立癌症研究所评定标准(NCI CTCAE V 5.0)的周围神经毒性分级、周围神经痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分,并于治疗后评定临床疗效。结果:治疗后及随访时,各组患者FACT/GOG-Ntx评分较治疗前降低(P<0.01);治疗后,3个电针组FACT/GOG-Ntx评分降低幅度大于西药组(P<0.01,P<0.05),2 Hz电针组与2 Hz/100 Hz电针组降低幅度大于100 Hz电针组(P<0.05);随访时,2 Hz电针组、2 Hz/100 Hz电针组FACT/GOG-Ntx评分降低幅度大于西药组(P<0.01)。治疗后,3个电针组周围神经毒性分级较治疗前改善(P<0.01);随访时,2 Hz电针组与2 Hz/100 Hz电针组周围神经毒性分级较治疗前改善(P<0.01)。治疗后,3个电针组周围神经痛VAS评分较治疗前降低(P<0.01,P<0.05);随访时,2Hz电针组、2Hz/100Hz电针组和西药组周围神经痛VAS评分较治疗前降低(P<0.01,P<0.05);治疗后及随访时,2 Hz/100 Hz电针组VAS评分降低幅度大于西药组(P<0.01,P<0.05)。治疗后,2 Hz电针组、100 Hz电针组、2 Hz/100 Hz电针组、西药组总有效率分别为79.5%(31/39)、68.4%(26/38)、81.1%(30/37)、47.4%(18/38),2 Hz电针组与2 Hz/100 Hz电针组总有效率高于西药组(P<0.05)。结论:电针能有效治疗紫杉类化疗药物所致CIPN,但不同频率电针的疗效总体没有差异,2Hz电针与2 Hz/100 Hz电针的疗效具有潜在优势;对于合并周围神经痛患者,更推荐采用2 Hz/100 Hz电针治疗。 Objective To observe the clinical efficacy of electroacupuncture(EA) at frequencies of 2 Hz, 100 Hz, and 2 Hz/100 Hz for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy(CIPN). Methods One hundred and sixty female breast cancer patients with CIPN induced by paclitaxel were randomly divided into a 2 Hz EA group(40 cases, 1 case dropped out),a 100 Hz EA group(40 cases, 2 cases dropped out), a 2 Hz/100 Hz EA group(40 cases, 3 cases dropped out), and a medication group(40 cases, 2 cases dropped out). The three EA groups received acupuncture at bilateral Quchi(LI 11),Waiguan(TE 5), Hegu(LI 4), Zusanli(ST 36), and Yanglingquan(GB 34). Electrodes of the HANS-200E acupoint nerve stimulator were connected to the same side Hegu(LI 4) and Waiguan(TE 5), and Zusanli(ST 36) and Sanyinjiao(SP 6), with EA stimulation frequencies of 2 Hz, 100 Hz, and 2 Hz/100 Hz, respectively. Each session lasted 30 min, once every other day, three times a week. The medication group received oral mecobalamin tablets, 0.5 mg per dose, three times a day. All groups were treated for four weeks. The functional assessment of cancer therapy/gynaecologic oncology group-neurotoxicity(FACT/GOG-Ntx), peripheral neurotoxicity grading based on the National Cancer Institute-common terminology criteria for adverse events Version 5.0(NCI-CTCAE V5.0), and peripheral neuropathy pain visual analogue scale(VAS) scores were observed before and after treatment, and at follow-up after 4 weeks of treatment completion, and clinical efficacy was evaluated after theatment. Results Compared before treatment, FACT/GOG-Ntx scores in all groups were decreased after treatment and during follow-up(P<0.01). The score reduction between before and after treatment in the three EA groups was greater than the medication group(P<0.01, P<0.05), with the 2 Hz and 2 Hz/100 Hz EA groups showing a greater reduction than the 100 Hz EA group(P<0.05). The reduction of FACT/GOG-Ntx score between before treatment and follow-up in the 2 Hz and 2 Hz/100 Hz EA groups was greater than the medication group(P<0.01).Peripheral neurotoxicity grading in the three EA groups were improved after treatment(P<0.01). Compared before treatment, the peripheral neurotoxicity grading in the 2 Hz and 2 Hz/100 Hz EA groups was improved at follow-up(P<0.01, P<0.05). The VAS scores for peripheral neuropathy pain in the three EA groups were decreased after treatment(P<0.01, P<0.05). At follow-up, VAS scores in the 2 Hz, 2 Hz/100 Hz, and medication groups were decreased(P<0.01,P<0.05), with a greater reduction in the 2 Hz/100 Hz EA group than the medication group after treatment and follow-up(P<0.01, P<0.05). The overall effective rates for the 2 Hz, 100 Hz, 2 Hz/100 Hz, and medication groups were 79.5%(31/39), 68.4%(26/38), 81.1%(30/37), and 47.4%(18/38), respectively, with the 2 Hz and 2 Hz/100 Hz groups showing higher effective rates than the medication group(P<0.05). Conclusion EA is effective in treating paclitaxel-induced CIPN. While there is no overall difference in efficacy among the different frequencies, 2 Hz and 2 Hz/100 Hz EA showing potential advantages. For patients with concurrent peripheral neuropathy pain, 2 Hz/100 Hz electroacupuncture is recommended.
作者 卢超 冯绪康 沈琼颖 李广亮 吴涛凭 李晓宇 邵喜英 王佩佩 李荣荣 邓亚萍 陈炜吉 LU Chao;FENG Xukang;SHEN Qiongying;LI Guangliang;WU Taoping;LI Xiaoyu;SHAO Xiying;WANG Peipei;LI Rongrong;DENG Yaping;CHEN Weiji(Department of TCM,Zhejiang Cancer Hospital,Hangzhou 310022,China;Third Clinical Medical College of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University;Department of Breast Oncology,Zhejiang Cancer Hospital,Hangzhou 310022,China;Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion,Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University/Zhejiang Zhongshan Hospital)
出处 《中国针灸》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2024年第10期1139-1145,共7页 Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion
基金 浙江省中医药科技计划科研基金项目:2022ZB058、2022ZB183、2023ZL293 浙江省医药卫生科技计划项目:2023KY883。
关键词 化疗所致周围神经病变 紫杉类药物 乳腺癌 电针 随机对照试验 chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy(CIPN) paclitaxel breast cancer electroacupuncture randomized controlled trial(RCT)
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献66

  • 1王友京,王双坤.不同强度和频率电针的镇痛效应[J].针刺研究,1993,18(1):44-47. 被引量:41
  • 2董礼,严隽陶,李善敬.疼痛与针刺镇痛[J].辽宁中医杂志,2005,32(8):768-770. 被引量:40
  • 3郭军,何芙蓉,孟华,刘文超.针刺治疗对紫杉醇所致的神经毒性反应的控制作用[J].中国临床康复,2005,9(41):10-10. 被引量:19
  • 4董彦敏,李惠林,倪青.针刺益气养阴活血法治疗糖尿病周围神经病变机制的实验研究[J].成都中医药大学学报,2006,29(3):47-50. 被引量:8
  • 5Hausheer F H, Schilsky R L,Bain S, et al. Diagno sis, management, and evaluation of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy[J]. Semin Oncol,2006, 33(1) :15-49.
  • 6Bi HD. Observation on the effect of auricular point sticking forvomiting induced by chemotherapy[J]. J Acupunct Tuina Sci, 2011,9(6) :367-369.
  • 7Shen GW, Zhao JS. Acupuncture and moxibustion regulation forpost-chemotherapy gastric motility[J]. J Acupunct Tuina Sci, 2011, 9(6) :362-366.
  • 8Grathey A. Oxaliplatin safety profile: neurotoxicity[J]. SeminOncol, 2003, 30(4):5.
  • 9Laurence G, Olivier C, Alain M, et al. Predictive factors of oxali-platin neurotoxicity: The involvement of the oxalate outcomepathway[J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2007,13:6359-6368.
  • 10Cascinu S’ Catalano V,Cordelia L, et al. Neumpretective effect ofreduced ghtathione on oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in advancedcolorectal cancer: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlledtria![J]. J Clin Oncol, 2002, 20 (16) : 3478-3483.

共引文献129

同被引文献54

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部