摘要
援用前人思想是哲学研究中“接着说”的思想要素,引注是其中最直观公开的形式。由于哲学一般在大多数人和大部分时间中都处于“接着说”认识范式中,引注遂被习惯化,甚至时尚化和教条化。然而在大量引注活动之余却缺乏对引注的规范性限制反思,以致贪婪追求引注,盲目追捧引注。但在思想的逻辑有效性标准下,不仅要求对一个引注条目作相对当下认识课题和认识环节的引注必要性和引注恰当性考察,而且要求对不同引注条目所属思想体系作严格的相容性审核,否则就会把不同引注条目间的直接或间接思想矛盾隐秘地带入认识过程,造成认识论断的逻辑无效。因此,只有谨慎对待引注而坚持对引注条目进行逻辑审查的引注哲学才是好的引注哲学,相反则是坏的引注哲学。
Citing previous ideas is the intellectual element of“going on”in philosophical studies,of which quotations are the most intuitive and public form.Since philosophy has generally been in the“going on”paradigm of understanding for most people and most of the time,citations have been customized,even fashioned and dogmatized.However,the lack of reflection on the normative limits of citation in the midst of the mass of citation activity has led to the greedy pursuit of citation and the blind pursuit of citation.However,under the criterion of logical validity of thought,it is not only required to examine the necessity and appropriateness of citation of a citation relative to the current cognitive subject and cognitive link,but also required to make a strict mutual compatibility audit of the thought system belonging to different citation entries,or else the direct or indirect contradiction of thought between different citation entries will be brought into the cognitive process in a covert manner,which results in the logical invalidity of the cognitive assertion.Therefore,only the philosophy of citation that treats citation with caution and insists on the logical examination of cited entries is a good philosophy of citation,while the opposite is a bad philosophy of citation.
出处
《阅江学刊》
2024年第3期27-33,172,共8页
Yuejiang Academic Journal
