摘要
文章基于CNKI核心文集数据库和CiteSpace5.5R2科学知识可视化图谱分析,从论文分布、研究机构组成、研究主题、热点演变等方面对我国生态产品价值研究的发展历程进行了分析。研究显示:(1)从2000年到2022年,我国生态产品价值实现研究经历了萌芽期、快速增长期、稳步增长期三个发展阶段,发文量变化与同期国家生态环境相关政策的变动步调基本一致;(2)高校、科研院所、政府部门等是生态产品价值实现研究的主体,各类机构之间存在一定程度的联系与互动;(3)生态产品价值实现研究的未来趋势将会更加注重产业对接、政策扶持、技术创新和市场推广;(4)生态产品供给能力提升机制、生态产品分类体系和价值核算准则、生态门槛约束下生态产业形成机制、生态产品实现模式的多样性等方面的研究有待深化。在图谱分析的基础上,文章指出我国生态产品价值实现研究存在生态产品的分类属性尚未得到明确界定、生态产品价值核算准确度共识度不高、研究机构交流协作不足等问题,并针对性地提出完善建议。
Based on CNKI core collection database and the visualization of scientific knowledge of CiteSpace5.5R2,this paper analyzes the development history of eco-product value research in China from the aspects of paper distribution,research institution composition,research topics,hot spots evolution,and so on.The results show that:①From 2000 to 2022,the research on the realization of the eco-product value in China has experienced three development stages:germination,rapid growth,and steady growth.The change of the number of published articles is basically consistent with the change of national ecological and environmental policies in the same period.②Universities,research institutes and government departments are the main bodies of eco-product value realization research.There is a certain degree of contact and interaction among all kinds of institutions.③The future trend of research on value realization of eco-product will pay more attention on industrial connection,policy support,technological innovation,and market promotion.④The research on the improvement mechanism of the supply capacity of eco-product,the classification system and value accounting criteria of eco-product,the formation mechanism of eco-industry under the constraint of eco-threshold,and the diversity of eco-product realization modes need to be deepened.Based on the analysis of the atlas,the paper points out that the ecoproduct value research in China has shortages including the classification attributes of eco-products have not been clearly defined,the consensus degree of accuracy of eco-product value accounting is not high,and the communication and cooperation between research institutions are insufficient.Accordingly,it puts forward some suggestions for improvement.
作者
张恩祥
乔琴
郑玉萍
杨科
邓淏丹
刘丽香
韩永伟
ZHANG Enxiang;QIAO Qin;ZHENG Yuping;YANG Ke;DENG Haodan;LIU Lixiang;HAN Yongwei(Institute of Ecology,Chinese Academy of Environmental Sciences,Beijing 100085,China;College of Ecology,Lanzhou University,Lanzhou Gansu 730199,China)
出处
《中国国土资源经济》
2023年第11期26-35,74,共11页
Natural Resource Economics of China
基金
国家自然科学基金青年基金项目“清淤和曝气对城市黑臭河流生态系统温室气体排放影响的机理研究”(41907392)。