期刊文献+

心理契约对网络问答社区核心参与者知识共享行为的多重影响路径研究——基于“知乎”和“百度知道”的对比分析 被引量:2

Study on the Multiple Influence Paths of PsychologicalContract on Knowledge Sharing Behavior of CoreParticipants in Online Q&A Community——Based on the Comparative Analysis of Zhihu and about:blank Knows
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于社会网络分析和熵值法,识别“知乎”和“百度知道”两种不同类型网络问答社区中具有吸聚力和影响力的核心参与者群体。基于社会交换理论构建研究模型,通过模糊集定性比较分析探索心理契约多要素对核心参与者知识共享行为影响的组态路径,进一步深入分析知识共享影响机制背后的共性和差异性机理。研究结果表明:两类网络问答社区中的核心参与者知识共享行为受到交易型与关系型心理契约两个维度的多因素协同联动影响;“知乎”和“百度知道”社区知识共享行为发生的组态构型不同,前者是关系型心理契约主导的综合驱动型和交易型心理契约主导的综合驱动型,后者是交易型心理契约主导的综合驱动型和交易型与关系型心理契约综合驱动型;社会交往、情感寄托和经济利益对“知乎”社区知识共享行为的整体影响更强。 Based on social network analysis and entropy method,this study identifies the core participant groups with attract cohesion and influence in two different types of online Q&A communities,Zhihu and about:blank Knows.By constructing a research model based on social exchange theory,the configurational path of multi-factors of psychological cont ract on the knowledge sharing behavior of core participants is explored through fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis.Furthermore,the commonalities and differences behind the mechanisms of knowledge sharing influence are analyzed in depth.The results show that the knowledge sharing behavior of core participants in both types of online Q&A communities is influenced by multiple factors from transactional and relational psychological contracts.The configurational patterns of knowledge sharing behavior differ between Zhihu and about:blank Knows:the former is a comprehensive driving type dominated by relational psychological contracts and a comprehensive driving type dominated by transactional psychological contracts,the latter is a comprehensive driving type dominated by transactional psychological contracts and a comprehensive driving type driven by transactional and relational psychological contracts;Social interaction,emotional sustenance and economic benefits have a stronger overall influence on knowledge sharing behavior in Zhihu.
作者 沈占波 刘建泽 冯欣雨 SHEN Zhanbo;LIU Jianze;FENG Xinyu(School of Management,Hebei University,Baoding,Hebei 071002)
出处 《管理现代化》 北大核心 2023年第6期98-107,共10页 Modernization of Management
基金 国家社会科学基金课题(21BGL132) 2023年度河北省社会科学发展研究课题(20230203010)。
关键词 网络问答社区 心理契约 知识共享行为 核心参与者 社会交换理论 Online Q&A community Psychological contract Knowledge sharing behavior Core participants Social exchange theory
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献140

  • 1毛波,尤雯雯.虚拟社区成员分类模型[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2006,46(z1):1069-1073. 被引量:79
  • 2甘永成.虚拟学习社区的知识建构分析框架[J].中国电化教育,2006(2):27-31. 被引量:33
  • 3任志安,毕玲.网络关系与知识共享:社会网络视角分析[J].情报杂志,2007,26(1):75-78. 被引量:55
  • 4宫辉,徐渝.高校BBS社群结构与信息传播的影响因素[J].西安交通大学学报(社会科学版),2007,27(1):93-96. 被引量:29
  • 5Kochikar Vp. Suresh, JK. Towards a knowledge-sharing organization: some challenges faced on the Infosys journey [R]. Indi-a: Infosys Technologies Limited, 2004:5-8.
  • 6Cowan R,Jonard N. Network Structure and the Diffusion of Knowledge[J].Journal of Economic Dynamics&Control,2004,(28): 1557-1575.
  • 7Reagans R, Mcevily B. Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer: The Effects of Cohesion and Range[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,2003,(48):240-267.
  • 8Sstephen JH, Yang YL, Chen A. Social Network -based System for Supporting Interactive Collaboration in Knowledge Sharing over Peer-to-peer Network[J].int. J. Human-Computer Studies,2007,68:321-332.
  • 9Wasserman S,Faus K.Social network analysis: methods and applications[M].Cambridge,U.K:Cambridge University Press, 1994:35-40.
  • 10Krackhardtd, Hanson Jr. Informal networks: the company behind the chart [J]. Harvard Business Review, 1993, (4):104-111.

共引文献79

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部