摘要
集体所有权如何行使是深化集体产权制度改革必须面对的问题,理论界对此存在诸多不同见解。通过梳理新中国成立以来农村产权主体变迁的历程可知,历史上的农村集体经济组织曾是无可争议的集体所有权人,但该种意义上的集体所有权本质上是一种类似于公法人的所有权。人民公社解体后,农村集体经济组织的私法人性质决定了其再无力担当集体所有权人,因此,农民集体概念的提出有其特定的规范目的。农村集体经济组织代表行使集体所有权源自法律对农民集体授权意思的直接拟制。为保持法律体系内在逻辑的一致性,总体上应参照国家所有权“委托—代理”机制塑造集体所有权的行使规则。
How to exercise collective ownership is the very problem in the process of deepening the reform of the system of collective property rights,over which the theorists concerned have controversies.The historical review of the major changes in the ownership of the rural property rights since the founding of the People s Republic of China reveals that in the past the rural collective economic organization had the undisputed collective ownership,but it was essentially a kind of ownership similar to that of the public legal person.After the dissolution of the people s commune,the nature of the rural collective economic organization as a private legal entity determined that it was no longer capable of acting as the owner of collective property rights,and therefore the concept of farmer-led collectives was developed for a specific normative purpose.The exercise of collective ownership by representatives of the rural collective economic organization stems from the law s direct formulation of the meaning of the authorization of the farmer-led collectives.In order to maintain the consistency of the internal logic of the legal system,the rules governing the exercise of collective ownership should be modeled on the“principal-agent”mechanism of the state ownership.
作者
石佳友
刘欢
SHI Jia-you;LIU Huan(Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872,China)
出处
《云南大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
2023年第5期84-94,共11页
The Journal of Yunnan University:Social Sciences Edition
基金
国家社科基金重大项目“健全以公平为原则的产权保护制度研究”(项目号:20ZDA049)
中国人民大学中华法治文明研究院2023年项目“民法典与中华法治文明的发展”的阶段性研究成果。
关键词
集体所有权
农民集体
农村集体经济组织
依法代表
委托代理
collective ownership
farmer collective
rural collective economic organization
legal representative
entrusted agent
