摘要
美国学者葛来仪和庄宛桦于2022年3月发表的研究报告,在片面选用有关历史证据材料的基础上,有意曲解联合国大会第2758号决议的有关内容,得出了完全错误的结论。该报告的本质是要在国际上制造“一中一台”,是对一个中国原则的公.然挑战,是对国际法和国际关系准则的公然违反。该报告以联大第2758号决议未提及.“台湾”为由提出“台湾地位未定论”,不仅存在逻辑错误,还忽视了决议通过的前提是一个中国原则这一事实;以“台湾享有民族自决权”为依据主张“台湾地位未定论”,更是毫无法律和事实基础。从学理、历史档案、文义解释以及嗣后实践等多个角度揭批“庄葛报告”的谬误之处,并分析该报告可能产生的不利影响,十分必要。
In March 2022,American scholars Jessica Drun and Bonnie Glaser published a research report that deliberately misinterprets the content of United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758 based on a selective use of historical evidence.This report draws completely erroneous conclusions.The essence of the report is to create the concept of“One China,One Taiwan”at the international level,which blatantly challenges the one-China principle and violates international law and norms of international relations.The two scholars argue that UN Resolution 2758 does not mention“Taiwan”,and thus claim that the“status of Taiwan is undetermined”.However,this argument not only contains logical errors but also overlooks the fact that the resolution was adopted on the premise of the one-China principle.Furthermore,the report asserts that Taiwan enjoys the right to self-determination based on the“Theory of the Undetermined Status of Taiwan”.However,this assertion lacks any legal or factual basis.It is of utmost importance to expose the reports fallacies in terms of rationales,historical evidence,textual interpretation,and policy practices.Additionally,it is imperative to analyze the potential adverse effects this report may bring.
作者
黄瑶
张书凝
Huang Yao;Zhang Shuning
出处
《台湾研究集刊》
CSSCI
2023年第4期28-44,共17页
Taiwan Research Journal
基金
2020年度国家社科基金重大研究专项(20VHQ005)。
关键词
联大第2758号决议
台湾地区
一个中国原则
民族自决
United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758
Taiwan Region
the one-China principle
right to self-determination
