期刊文献+

姜科基因组复杂性的比较基因组学研究

Comparative Genomics Study on the Genome Complexity of Zingiberaceae
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 以菖蒲为外类群,对姜科物种进行比较基因组学分析,结果表明,姜、草果及砂仁在进化过程中经历并共享了至少4次全基因组加倍事件,且各物种基因组在分歧之后没有再发生加倍事件,各物种基因组受多倍化影响发生了大量的基因丢失。对姜科基因组复杂性的比较研究对其物种遗传基因功能创新具有重要意义,可为单子叶植物进化史研究提供参考。 The study does comparative genomic analysis of Zingiberaceae with calamus as an outgroup.The results show ginger,grass and amomum have experienced and shared at least 4 genome-wide doubling events in the course of evolution,and the doubling events haven’t occur again after the divergence of the genome of each species,and a large number of genes are lost due to the influence of polyploidy.The comparative study of genomic complexity of Zingiberaceae is of great significance for the innovation of genetic function of its species,and can provide reference for the study of the evolutionary history of monocotyledonous plants.
作者 胡福博 王希胤 Hu Fubo;Wang Xiyin(North China University of Science and Technology,Tangshan 063210,China;Genomics and Computational Biology Research Center,North China University of Science and Technology,Tangshan 063210,China)
出处 《黑龙江科学》 2023年第14期68-71,共4页 Heilongjiang Science
基金 国家自然科学基金项目“基于基因共线性的植物基因组学数据库建设研究”(32070669)。
关键词 姜科 基因组复杂性 多倍化 Zingiberaceae Genome complexity Polyploidization
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献36

  • 1潘增祥,陈杰,黄瑞华,许丹,徐银学,谢庄,姜志华,刘红林,赵如茜.猪脂肪及肌肉组织中基因表达信息分析[J].Acta Genetica Sinica,2005,32(3):264-274. 被引量:5
  • 2Venter JC, Adams MD, Myers EW, Li PW, Mural RJ, Sutton GG, Smith HO, Yandell M, Evans CA, Holt RA. The sequence of the human genome. Science, 2001, 291(5507): 1304-1351.
  • 3Berglund AC, Sjolund E, Ostlund G, Sonnhammer ELL. InParanoid 6: eukaryotic ortholog clusters with inparalogs. Nucleic Acids Res, 2008, 36(1): D263-266.
  • 4Brettin TS, Tapia R, Saw JH, West R, Tseng CH, Song J, Xie G Myers GL. Streptococcus in toto: the orthologous gene Database. 2008. http://iadr.confex.com/iadr/2008Dallas.
  • 5Matsuya A, Sakate R, Kawahara Y, Koyanagi KO, Sato Y, Fujii Y, Yamasaki C, Habara T, Nakaoka H, Todokoro F, Yamaguchi K, Endo T, Oota S, Makalowski W, Ikeo K, Suzuki Y, Hanada K, Hashimoto K, Hirai M, Iwama H,Saitou N, Hiraki AT, Jin L, Kaneko Y, Kanno M, Murakami K, Noda AO, Saichi N, Sanbonmatsu R, Suzuki M, Takeda J, Tanaka M, Gojobori T, Imanishi T, Itoh T. Evola Ortholog database of all human genes in H-InvDB with manual curation of phylogenetic trees. Nucleic Acids Res, 2008, 36(1): D787-792.
  • 6Waterston RH, Lindblad-Toh K, Birney E, Rogers J, Abril JF, Agarwal P, Agarwala R, Ainscough R, Alexandersson M, An P. Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome. Nature, 2002, 420(6915): 520-562.
  • 7King DC, Taylor J, Zhang Y, Cheng Y, Lawson HA, Martin J, Chiaromonte F, Miller W, Hardison RC. Finding cis-regulatory elements using comparative genomics: some lessons from ENCODE data. Genome Res, 2007, 17(06): 775-786.
  • 8Miller W, Makova KD, Nekrutenko A, Hardison RC. Comparative genomics. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet, 2004, 5: 15-56.
  • 9Nobrega MA, Pennacchio LA. Comparative genomic analysis as a tool for biological discovery. Physiological Soc, 2004, 554 (Pt 1): 31-39.
  • 10Tatusov RL, Galperin MY, Natale DA, Koonin EV. The COG database: a tool for genome-scale analysis of protein functions and evolution. Nucleic Acids Res, 2000, 28(1): 33-36.

共引文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部