期刊文献+

白蛋白球蛋白比值(AGR)、PSA联合Gleason评分对局限性前列腺癌患者预后的预测价值分析 被引量:6

Predictive Value of Albumin-to-globulin Ratio(AGR),PSA Combined with Gleason Score on the Prognosis of Patients with Localized Prostate Cancer
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析白蛋白球蛋白比值(AGR)、前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)联合Gleason评分对局限性前列腺癌患者预后的预测价值。方法回顾性分析98例局限性前列腺癌患者的临床资料,以患者治疗后是否发展为去势抵抗性前列腺癌(CRPC)分为CRPC组(n=31)及非CRPC组(n=67),比较两组患者治疗前AGR、PSA、Gleason评分,应用Logistic分析模型分析AGR、PSA、Gleason评分与局限性前列腺癌患者发展为CRPC的相关性,应用受试者工作曲线(ROC)分析AGR、PSA、Gleason评分联合预估局限性前列腺癌患者发展为CRPC的预测价值。分别比较不同AGR、PSA、Gleason评分局限性前列腺癌患者的无进展生存期(PFS)。结果CRPC组AGR水平显著低于非CRPC组(P<0.05);CRPC组PSA水平、Gleason评分显著高于非CRPC组(P<0.05)。经Logistic分析模型分析,AGR水平与局限性前列腺癌患者发展为CRPC呈负相关(P<0.05),PSA水平、Gleason评分与局限性前列腺癌患者发展为CRPC呈正相关(P<0.05)。ROC曲线中,AGR、PSA、Gleason评分联合预估局限性前列腺癌患者发展为CRPC的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.849,敏感度为87.10%,特异度为64.18%。高AGR水平患者PFS显著高于低AGR水平患者,高PSA水平患者PFS显著短于低PSA水平患者,高Gleason评分患者PFS显著短于低Gleason评分患者(P<0.05)。结论AGR、PSA、Gleason评分与局限性前列腺癌患者发展为CRPC密切相关,可为术后早期识别CRPC高危患者、及时制定诊疗方案提供数据支持。 Objective To analyze the predictive value of albumin-to-globulin ratio(AGR),prostate specific antigen(PSA)combined with Gleason score on the prognosis of patients with localized prostate cancer.Methods The clinical data of 98 patients with localized prostate cancer were retrospectively analyzed.According to whether the patients developed into castration-resistant prostate cancer(CRPC)after treatment,they were divided into CRPC group(n=31)and non-CRPC group(n=67).The AGR,PSA and Gleason score before treatment were compared between the 2 groups of patients.Logistic analysis model was used to analyze the correlation between AGR,PSA,Gleason score and progression to CRPC in patients with localized prostate cancer.Receiver operating characteristic curve(ROC)was applied to analyze the predictive value of the combination of AGR,PSA and Gleason score on predicting the progression to CRPC in patients with localized prostate cancer.The progression-free survival(PFS)was compared among patients with localized prostate cancer of different AGR,PSA and Gleason score.Results The AGR in CRPC group was significantly lower than that in non-CRPC group(P<0.05).The PSA level and Gleason score in CRPC group were significantly higher compared with those in non-CRPC group(P<0.05).Logistic analysis model showed that the AGR was negatively correlated with the progression to CRPC in patients with localized prostate cancer(P<0.05),and PSA level and Gleason score were positively correlated with progression to CRPC in patients with localized prostate cancer(P<0.05).According to ROC curve,the area under the curve(AUC),sensitivity and specificity of the combination of AGR,PSA and Gleason score on predicting the progression to CRPC in patients with localized prostate cancer were 0.849,87.10% and 64.18%.The PFS of patients with high AGR level was significantly longer than that in patients with low AGR level,and the PFS of patients with high PSA level was significantly shorter than that in patients with low PSA level,and the PFS of patients with high Gleason score was significantly shorter than that in patients with low Gleason score(P<0.05).Conclusion AGR,PSA and Gleason score are closely related to the progression to CRPC in patients with localized prostate cancer,and can provide data support for the early i-dentification of patients with high-risk CRPC and the timely formulation of diagnosis and treatment plan.
作者 王丽华 范璐璐 任妍 WANG Lihua;FAN Lulu;REN Yan(Zhengzhou Yihe Hospital Affiliated to Henan University,Zhengzhou,450000)
出处 《实用癌症杂志》 2023年第6期1022-1026,共5页 The Practical Journal of Cancer
关键词 白蛋白球蛋白比值 前列腺特异性抗原 GLEASON评分 局限性前列腺癌 预后 Albumin-to-globulin ratio Prostate specific antigen Gleason score Localized prostate cancer Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献102

  • 1王霄英,周良平,丁建平,王刚,肖江喜,蒋学祥.中国正常成年男性前列腺的MRS定量分析[J].中国医学影像技术,2003,19(5):576-578. 被引量:24
  • 2夏同礼,孔祥田,苏晋伟,郭应禄.前列腺潜伏癌的初步调查[J].中华医学杂志,1995,75(9):565-566. 被引量:5
  • 3Freedland SJ, Wieder JA, Jack GS, et al. Improved risk stratification for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy using a novel risk group system based on prostate specific antigen density and biopsy gleason score. J Urol, 2002, 168:110-115.
  • 4周利群.前列腺癌病理Gleason评分为7的患者的生存愈后因素:3+4与4+3的区别[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2002,23:256-256.
  • 5Kurhanewicz J, Vigneron DB, Hricak H, et al. Three-dimensional H-1 MR imaging of the in situ human prostate with high (0.24-0.7 cm^3 ) spatial resolution. Radiology, 1996, 198 : 795-805.
  • 6Ismail M, Gomella LG. Ultrasound for prostate imaging and biopsy.Curr Opin Urol, 2001, 11: 471-477.
  • 7Kurhanewiez J, Vigneron DB, Males RG, et al. The prostate: MR imaging and spectroscopy. Radiol Clin North Am, 2000, 38:115-138.
  • 8Egevad L, Granfors T, Karlberg L, et al. Prognostic value of the Gleason score in prostate cancer. BJU Int,2002,89:538-542.
  • 9Epstein JI, Potter SR. The pathological interpretation and significance of prostate needle biopsy findings: implications and current controversies. J Urol, 2001, 166: 402-410.
  • 10Noguchi M, Stamey TA , McNeal JE , et al . Relationship between systematic biopsies and histological features of 222 radical prostatectomy specimens: lack of prediction of tumor significance for men with nonpalpable prostate cancer. J Urol, 2001, 166: 104-110.

共引文献138

同被引文献81

引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部