摘要
清代神木地区先后纂修了两部方志,即为清雍正《神木县志》与清道光《神木县志》。因现存清雍正《神木县志》的版本内容部分残缺,目前学界对该志的真伪及成书年代尚存争议,莫衷一是。清道光《神木县志》的成书年代较晚,内容保存完整,是神木旧志的代表之作。经考证,现存版本的清雍正《神木县志》并非为清道光《神木县志》中纂修者所提及的四本抄志,清道光《神木县志》也并非是在现存雍正《神木县志》的基础上纂修的,两部志书在体例及内容书写上存在较大的差异,所载内容相互抵牾,纂修方式并无明显地顺承关系。雍正《神木县志》的体例较道光《神木县志》为优,但内容远不及道光《神木县志》丰富详实,二者互有优劣,各有千秋。两部县志都具有较高的史料价值,是研究军事史、文学史、民族史、社会风俗史的重要文献资料。
In the Qing Dynasty,there was two revised local records of Shenmu,that is,Yongzheng version and Daoguang version.Due to the incomplete content of the existing edition of Annals of Shenmu County of Yongzheng in Qing Dynasty,the authenticity of the annals and the date of its completion are still disputed in the academic circle.Daoguang Shenmu County Records thatwas completed later,is the representative of the old records of Shenmu.After research,the existing version of Yongzheng’s Shenmu County Records is not the mentioned four copies of the Daoguang’s Shenmu County Records.The latter is not complied on the basis of the former,and there are big differences between two records in the style and content writing.Each has its own advantages and disadvantages,and both of them are of high historical value and important documents for the study of military history,literature history,national history and social custom history.
作者
张甜
卢征良
ZHANG Tian;LU Zheng-liang(Department of Ideological and Political Eduacation,Hope College of Southwest JiaoTong University,Chengdu 610400,China;School of Tourism and History and Culture,Southwest Minzu University,Chengdu 610041,China)
出处
《榆林学院学报》
2023年第3期14-21,共8页
Journal of Yulin University
关键词
清代《神木县志》
纂修特征
历史价值
考证
比较研究
Shenmu County Records in the Qing Dynasy
compilation style
historical value
textual research
comparative study
