摘要
对于现代人而言,媒介不仅介入和影响了时间的感知和使用经验,也在建构日常生活的意义上改变了时间的性质。伊尼斯作为较早关注到传播媒介本身的西方学者,也率先从媒介的物质性视角看待时间问题。他的时空偏向理论从宏观的、知识运输的层面为我们把握媒介、人与时间的关系提供了路径。如果说伊尼斯开创了“媒介-时间”研究的结构主义先河,那么在他之后的基特勒,则打开了这一研究的后结构主义大门。他以数据处理的可能性重新阐释媒介与时间的关系,并突破性地提出了“时间轴操纵”理论,由此“媒介-时间”研究进入微观层面。本文在比较视野的观照下,探究了伊尼斯与基特勒“媒介-时间”观的异同性,并表明二者为推进该研究领域的发展所做出的理论贡献,为数字时代人们正确处理媒介与时间的关系提供思想参考。
For modern people,the media not only intervenes and affects the perception and use experience of time,but also changes the nature of time in the sense of constructing daily life.As an early Western scholar,Innis paid attention to the media itself,also took the lead in viewing time a way for us to grasp the relationship among media,people and time from the macro and knowledge transportation level.After Innis pioneered the structuralism of"media-time"research,Kittler opened the door of post-structuralism in this research.He reinterpreted the relationship between media and time with the possibility of data processing,and made a breakthrough in proposing the theory of"time axis manipulation",thus entering the micro level of"media-time"research.This paper explores the similarities and differences between Innis and Kittler's"media-time"views in a comparative perspective,and shows their theoretical contributions to promoting the development of this research field,which provides the ideological basis to help people correctly deal with the relationship between media and time in the Digital Age.
作者
徐皞亮
Xu Haoliang(School of Journalism and Information Communication,Huazhong University of Science and Technology)
出处
《新闻界》
CSSCI
北大核心
2023年第3期86-96,共11页
Journalism and Mass Communication
