期刊文献+

基于SEM的重大灾害事故应急救援协同影响因素分析 被引量:1

SEM-based analysis of influencing factors of major disaster accident emergency rescue coordination
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 为准确衡量重大灾害事故应急救援协同影响因素对应急救援效果的作用程度,采用结构方程模型(SEM)对影响重大灾害事故应急救援协同的主要因素进行分析。结果表明:救援准备协同、指挥决策协同、生命救援协同、事故处置协同和救援保障协同对突发事件应急救援效果有显著的正向影响,其中生命救援协同对突发事件应急救援效果影响最大,主要强调被困人员医疗救治协同和人员搜救协同,其次分别是事故处置协同、救援保障协同、指挥决策协同、救援准备协同。最后,根据研究结果提出了相应的提升对策,有助于提高重大灾害事故应急救援协同能力。 In order to accurately measure the extent of the influence factors of emergency rescue synergy of major disasters and accidents on the effectiveness of emergency rescue,structural equation modeling(SEM)is used to analyze the main factors affecting emergency rescue synergy of major disasters and accidents.The results show that coordination of rescue preparation,coordination of command and decision-making,coordination of life rescue,coordination of accident handling,and coordination of rescue support have a significant positive impact on the effect of emergency rescue.Among them,coordination of life rescue has the greatest impact on the effect of emergency rescue.The main emphasis is on the coordination of medical rescue and rescue of the trapped persons,followed by coordination of accident handling,coordination of rescue support,coordination of command and decision-making,and coordination of rescue preparations.Finally,corresponding enhancement countermeasures are proposed based on the research results,which can help improve the emergency rescue synergy capability of major disasters and accidents.
作者 张永领 梁闫 ZHANG Yongling;LIANG Yan(College of Emergency Management,Henan University of Technology,Jiaozuo,Henan 454003,China)
出处 《工业安全与环保》 2023年第2期74-78,89,共6页 Industrial Safety and Environmental Protection
基金 国家社会科学基金(20BDJ030) 河南联合基金重点项目(U1904210)。
关键词 应急救援效果 重大灾害事故 结构方程模型 协同能力 emergency rescue effect major disaster accident structural equation model coordination ability
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献67

  • 1刘霞,向良云.我国公共危机网络治理结构——双重整合机制的构建[J].东南学术,2006(3):23-29. 被引量:41
  • 2张红涛,王二平.态度与行为关系研究现状及发展趋势[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(1):163-168. 被引量:149
  • 3[1]Tucker L R, Lewis C. The reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1973, 38: 1~10
  • 4[2]Steiger J H, Lind J M. Statistically-based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the Psychometrika Society Meeting, IowaCity, May, 1980
  • 5[3]Bentler P M, Bonett D G. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 1980, 88: 588~ 606
  • 6[4]Bentler P M. Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin,1990, 107: 238~ 246
  • 7[5]McDonald R P, Marsh H W. Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness-of-fit. Psychological Bulletin, 1990,107: 247~ 255
  • 8[6]Marsh H W, Balla J R, Hau K T. An evaluation of incremental fit indices: A clarification of mathematical and empirical processes. In: Marcoulides G A, Schumacker R E eds. Advanced structural equation modeling techniques. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1996. 315~ 353
  • 9[7]Browne M W, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen K A, Long J S eds. Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1993. 136~ 162
  • 10[8]Joreskog K G, Srbom D. LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago: Scientific Software International, 1993

共引文献1561

同被引文献1

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部