摘要
由于人类生活的社会性、资源的稀缺性、个人价值观的差异性及法律规范本身的概括性和不周延性等原因,基本权利冲突在所难免。在自由权侵害三阶层审查框架中,基本权利冲突具有多重地位,兼具规范性和事实性,难以在某一阶层或者采用单一方案彻底解决此类问题,何况各种解决方案本身也存在不足,故而不仅应关注经由解释明确基本权利保护范围、依照基本权利位阶予以处理、根据实践调和原则进行个案权衡、引入比例原则、基本权利行使的前置程序等解释论方案,还应关注通过立法预先设定解决方案的立法论方案。
Due to the sociality of human livings,the scarcity of resources,the diversity of values,the generality and imperfectness of the legal norms and so on,it is inevitable to have collisions among the individual fundamental rights.Such collision not only plays various and important roles in the three-tiers framework of infringement of liberties and freedoms scrutiny,but also is a combination of norms and facts;therefore,it could not be expected to resolve such collisions within a single-tier approach.Besides,the approaches themselves are imperfect.As a result,in order to resolve the collision,it is necessary to resort to the approaches of interpretation,such as the definition of the scope and hierarchy of fundamental rights,the application of the principle of practical concordance,the individualized consideration,the incorporation of proportionality,the pre-procedure of exercise the fundamental rights,and it is also necessary to pay attention to the legislation prescribing the resolution of such collision.
出处
《中外法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2021年第6期1426-1444,共19页
Peking University Law Journal
基金
2020年度教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“基本权利干预研究”(项目编号:20YJC820031)的阶段性研究成果。
关键词
基本权利冲突
实践调和原则
个案衡量
Collision of Fundamental Rights
Principle of Practical Concordance
Individualized Consideration
