期刊文献+

不同时机软通道微创手术对高血压脑出血的疗效 被引量:3

在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较不同时机软通道微创手术对高血压脑出血的疗效。方法:选取2017年5月至2019年5月期间五华县人民医院收治的80例高血压脑出血患者为研究对象,根据发病后实施手术的时间将患者分成两组,发病后7~24 h实施手术治疗患者40例为对照组,发病后24~72 h实施手术治疗患者40例为对照组,比较两组患者临床疗效。结果:治疗后,观察组患者的总有效率明显高于观察组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组患者的神经功能缺损(DNS)评分明显优于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后半年,观察组患者的日常生活能力量表(ADL)分级情况明显优于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:高血压脑出血患者在7~24 h内实施软通道微创手术治疗的效果更好。
作者 曾宏 张剑平
机构地区 五华县人民医院
出处 《深圳中西医结合杂志》 2021年第2期121-122,共2页 Shenzhen Journal of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献86

  • 1柳卫民,郑丽芳,梅元武.脑卒中患者生活质量的评估及其影响因素[J].中国临床康复,2005,9(29):142-144. 被引量:15
  • 2Shah S,Vanclay F, Cooper B. Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel IndeX for stroke rehabilitation. J Clin Epidemiol, 1989,42:703-709.
  • 3Eakin P, Baird H. The Community Dependency Index:a standardized assessment of need and measure of outcome for community occupational therapy. Br J Occup Ther, 1995,58 : 17-22.
  • 4Hachisuka K, Ogata H, Ohkkuma H, et al. Test-retest and inter-method reliability of the self-rating Barthel Index. Clin Rehabil, 1997,11 : 28 -35.
  • 5Pedersen PM, Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, et al. Comprehensive assessment of activities of daily living in stroke. The copenhagen strokes study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 1997,78:161-165.
  • 6Kwon S,Hartzema AG,Duncan PW,et al. Disability measures in stroke: relationship among the Barthel Index, the functional independence measure and the modified Rankin scale. Stroke, 2004, 35: 918-923.
  • 7Dennis W, Pamela W, Sue ML. Comparison of responsiveness of the Barthel Index and the motor component of the functional measure in stroke,the impact of using different methods for measuring responsiveness. J Clin Epidemiol,2002,55:922-928.
  • 8Gosman-Hedstrom G, Svensson E. Parallel reliability of the functional independence measure and the Barthel ADL index. Disabil Rehabil, 2000,22:702-715.
  • 9Wallace D, Duncan PW, Lai SM. Comparison of the responsiveness of the Barthel Index and the motor component of the functional independence measure in stroke :the impact of using different methods for measuring responsiveness. J Clin Epidemiol,2002,5:922-928.
  • 10Van Bennekom CAM ,Jelles F, Lankhorst GJ, et al. Responsiveness of the rehabilitation activities profile and the Barthe Index. J Clin Epidemiol, 1996,49:39-44.

共引文献5542

同被引文献45

引证文献3

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部