期刊文献+

脉冲式高容量血液滤过联合血液灌流治疗脓毒性休克并发肾损伤的临床研究 被引量:15

Clinical effects of pulse high-volume hemofiltration combined with hemoperfusion on septic shock with renal injury
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评估脉冲式高容量血液滤过(PHVHF)联合血液灌流(HP)治疗脓毒性休克并发肾损伤患者的临床疗效。方法 2015年1月至2018年12月在江南大学附属医院明确诊断为脓毒性休克并发肾损伤住院患者36例,随机分为连续性血液滤过(CVVH)组(n=18)及PHVHF联合HP组(n=18)。对比两组病人治疗前后生命体征、生化指标、急性生理与慢性健康(APACHEⅡ)评分、序贯器官衰竭(SOFA)评分以及去甲肾上腺素用量。采用ELISA方法检测治疗0h、2h、24h后血液及滤液白细胞介素(IL)-10,IL-6以及肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)-α的浓度。记录两组病人28 d病死率及90 d肾功能恢复情况。结果联合治疗组治疗后心率、WBC、C反应蛋白(CRP)、降钙素原(PCT)、APACHEⅡ评分、SOFA评分及去甲肾上腺素量下降优于CVVH组(P<0.05)。24 h后两组血液IL-10,IL-6以及TNF-α均有下降(P<0.05),联合治疗组效果更佳(P<0.05),HP治疗2h后即有明显下降(P<0.05),两组滤过液中均检测到以上炎症因子。联合治疗组28 d病死率为27.7%,有7例患者90 d内肾功能恢复,CVVH组病死率为38.8%,4例患者肾功能恢复。结论PHVHF联合HP可有效治疗脓毒性休克并发肾损伤。 Objective To evaluate the clinical effects of PHVHF combined with HP on septic shock with renal injury.Methods A total of 36 cases were involved in this study and were randomly divided into two groups: PHVHF & HP group(n=18)and CVVH group(n=18). Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation(APACHE)Ⅱ score,sequential organ failure assessment(SOFA)score,vital signs, biochemical changes and the dose of norepinephrine were compared before and after the treatment. The levels of IL-6,IL-10 and TNF-α in plasma and ultrafiltrate were assessed by ELISA before and after treatment for 0 h, 2 h and 24 h. The 28-day mortalities and the recovery of renal function within 90 days were also observed. Results After treatment,the decline of heart rate(HR),white blood cell(WBC),C-reactive protein( CRP),procalcitonin(PCT),APACHE II score,SOFA score and the dose of norepinephrine in combined group was better than that in CVVH group(P<0.05). After 24 h of treatment,the levels of IL-6,IL-10 and TNF-α decreased in both groups(P < 0.05),and the decrease was more significant in HP&PHVHF group(P<0.05). After 2 h of hemoperfison,there was a significant reduction in these inflammatory factors(P < 0.05). They were also detected in the filtrate of both groups. The mortality of combined therapy group was 27.7%,while in CVVH group it was 38.8%. Renal function of 7 patients in combined group recovered within 90 days,while 4 patients in CVVH group. Conclusion HP combined with PHVHF has a significant effect on septic shock with renal injury.
作者 储腊萍 俞娅芬 彭俊琼 周丽芳 魏宏义 胡敏红 CHU La-ping;YU Ya-fen;PENG Jun-qiong;ZHOU Li-fang;WEI Hong-yi;HU Min-hong(Deprmern of Nepbrology.,Affiliated Hospitnal of Jinngnan Uniersily,Wroui 214062.Chinn)
出处 《中国实用内科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2020年第4期331-335,共5页 Chinese Journal of Practical Internal Medicine
基金 无锡市科教强卫医学青年人才项目(QNRCO48)。
关键词 血液灌流 脉冲式高容量血液滤过 连续性血液滤过 脓毒性休克肾损伤 炎症因子 hemoperfusion pulse high-volume hemofiltration continuous hemofiltration septic shock with renal injury inflammatory factor
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献48

  • 1Uchino S, Bellomo R, Goldsmith D, et al. An assessment of the RIFLE criteria for acute renal, failure in hospitalized patients [J]. Crit Care Med, 2006, 34 (7): 1913-1917. DOI: 10.1097/01.CCM. 0000224227.70642.4F.
  • 2Hoste EA, Clermont G, Kersten A, et al. RIFLE criteria for acute kidney injury are associated with hospital mortality in critically ill patients: a cohort analysis [J]. Crit Care, 2006, 10 (3): R73. DOI: 10.1186/cc4915.
  • 3Silvester W, Bellomo R, Cole L. Epidemiology, management, and outcome of severe acute renal failure of critical illness in Australia [J]. Crit Care Med, 2001, 29 (10): 1910-1915.
  • 4Levy MM, Fink MP, Marshall JC, et al. 2001 SCCM/ESICM/ ACCP/ATS/SIS International Sepsis Definitions Conference [J]. Crit Care Med, 2003, 31 (4): 1250-1256. DOI: 10.1097/01.CCM. 0000050454.01978.3B.
  • 5Bellomo R, Ronco C, Kellum JA, et al. Acute renal failure- definition, outcome measures, animal models, fluid therapy and information technology needs: the Second International Consensus Conference of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) Group [J]. Crit Care, 2004, 8 (4): R204-212. DOI: 10.1186/cc2872.
  • 6Dellinger RP, Carlet JM, Masur H, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock [J]. Crit Care Med, 2004, 32 (3): 858-873. DOI: 10.1097/01.CCM. 0000117317.18092.E4.
  • 7Mandelbaum T, Scott D J, Lee J, et al. Outcome of critically ill patients with acute kidney injury using the Acute Kidney Injury Network criteria [J]. Crit Care Med, 2011, 39 (12): 2659-2664DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318228 lflb.
  • 8Nalesso F, Ricci Z, Ronco C. Management of acute renal dysfunction in sepsis [J]. Curr Infect Dis Rep, 2012, 14 (5): 462- 473. DOI: 10.1007/s11908-012-0274-4.
  • 9Yegenaga I, Tuglular S, Ari E, et al. Evaluation of sepsis/systemic inflammatory response syndrome, acute kidney injury, and RIFLE criteria in two tertiary hospital intensive care units in Turkey [J]. Nephron Clin Pract, 2010, 115 (4): c276-282. DOI: 10.1159/000313486.
  • 10Suh SH, Kim CS, Choi JS, et al. Acute kidney injury in patients with sepsis and septic shock: risk factors and clinical outcomes [J]. Yonsei Med J, 2013, 54 (4): 965-972. DOI: lO.3349/ymj.2013. 54.4.965.

共引文献246

同被引文献179

引证文献15

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部