摘要
目的:探讨PFNA与人工股骨头置换术治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折的效果及安全性.方法:选择笔者所在医院2018年1-7月收治的118例老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者作为研究对象,随机分为两组.FHR组给予人工股骨头置换术(FHR)治疗,PFNA组给予股骨近端防旋髓内钉(PFNA)治疗,比较两组治疗效果和安全性.结果:PFNA组手术时间短于FHR组,术中出血量少于FHR组,并发症发生率低于FHR组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组住院时间、骨折愈合时间、术后3、6个月Harris评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论:PFNA与FHR治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折均具有良好效果,但PFNA操作简便,对患者创伤小,术后并发症少.
Objective:To investigate the efficacy and safety of PFNA and artificial femoral head replacement in the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly.Method:A total of 118 elderly patients with intertrochanteric fracture of femur admitted to our hospital from January to July 2018 were selected as the study subjects and randomly divided into two groups.The FHR group was treated with artificial femoral head replacement,the PFNA group was treated with proximal femoral anti-rotation intramedullary nail.The efficacy and safety of the two groups were compared.Result:The operation time,intraoperative bleeding volume and complication rate in PFNA group were significantly lower than those in FHR group,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).There were no significant difference in hospitalization time,fracture healing time,Harris score at 3 months and 6 months after operation between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion:PFNA and FHR have a good effect in the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture of femur in the elderly,but PFNA is easy to operate,has small bed size and fewer complications after operation.
作者
何正兵
HE Zhengbing(Gong’an County Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Gong’an 434300,China)
出处
《中外医学研究》
2020年第2期147-149,共3页
CHINESE AND FOREIGN MEDICAL RESEARCH
关键词
股骨粗隆间骨折
人工股骨头置换术
股骨近端防旋髓内钉
Femoral intertrochanteric fracture
Artificial femoral head replacement
Proximal femoral anti-rotation intramedullary nail
