期刊文献+

Prognostic value of serum microRNA-122 in hepatocellular carcinoma is dependent on coexisting clinical and laboratory factors 被引量:4

Prognostic value of serum microRNA-122 in hepatocellular carcinoma is dependent on coexisting clinical and laboratory factors
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 BACKGROUND There is ongoing search for new noninvasive biomarkers to improve management of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC).Studies,mostly from the Asian-Pacific region,demonstrated differential expression of liverspecific microRNA-122(miR-122)in tissue as well as in sera of patients with hepatitis B virus-and hepatitis C virus-induced HCC.AIM To evaluate prognostic value of miR-122 in patients with HCC in a European population and determine potential factors related to alteration of miR-122 in sera.METHODS Patients with confirmed HCC(n=91)were included in the study over a two-year period.Patients were characterized according to Child-Pugh score,Barcelona clinic liver cancer(BCLC)staging system,etiology of liver disease,laboratory parameters and overall survival.MiR-122 was measured in sera using TaqMan assay normalized to spiked-in cel-miR-39.RESULTS Serum miR-122 quantity was independent of the Child-Pugh score,the BCLC stage or the underlying etiology.Significant positive correlation was found between miR-122 and alanine aminotransferase(P<0.0001),aspartate aminotransferase(P=0.0001),alpha-fetoprotein(AFP)(P=0.0034)and hemoglobin concentration(P=0.076).Negative correlation was observed between miR-122 level and creatinine concentration(P=0.0028).AFP,Child-Pugh score and BCLC staging system were associated with survival differences.In overall cohort low miR-122 in sera was only associated with a trend for a better overall survival without reaching statistical significance.Subgroup analysis revealed that low miR-122 was significantly associated with better prognosis in patients with advanced cirrhosis(Child-Pugh class B/C),advanced tumor stage(BCLC B/C/D)and normal AFP(<7 ng/mL).CONCLUSION Our results strongly support the value of miR-122 as potential biomarker of liver injury and probably prognosis.Nevertheless,the value of miR-122 in prediction of prognosis of HCC patients was limited to certain patients’subgroups.Since circulating miR-122 may be influenced by impaired renal function,AFP and hemoglobin concentration,those factors need to be considered while interpreting miR-122 level. BACKGROUND There is ongoing search for new noninvasive biomarkers to improve management of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC). Studies, mostly from the Asian-Pacific region, demonstrated differential expression of liverspecific microRNA-122(miR-122) in tissue as well as in sera of patients with hepatitis B virus-and hepatitis C virus-induced HCC.AIM To evaluate prognostic value of miR-122 in patients with HCC in a European population and determine potential factors related to alteration of miR-122 in sera.METHODS Patients with confirmed HCC(n = 91) were included in the study over a two-year period. Patients were characterized according to Child-Pugh score, Barcelona clinic liver cancer(BCLC) staging system, etiology of liver disease, laboratory parameters and overall survival. MiR-122 was measured in sera using TaqMan assay normalized to spiked-in cel-miR-39.RESULTS Serum miR-122 quantity was independent of the Child-Pugh score, the BCLC stage or the underlying etiology. Significant positive correlation was found between miR-122 and alanine aminotransferase(P < 0.0001), aspartate aminotransferase(P = 0.0001), alpha-fetoprotein(AFP)(P = 0.0034) and hemoglobin concentration(P = 0.076). Negative correlation was observed between miR-122 level and creatinine concentration(P = 0.0028). AFP, ChildPugh score and BCLC staging system were associated with survival differences.In overall cohort low miR-122 in sera was only associated with a trend for a better overall survival without reaching statistical significance. Subgroup analysis revealed that low miR-122 was significantly associated with better prognosis in patients with advanced cirrhosis(Child-Pugh class B/C), advanced tumor stage(BCLC B/C/D) and normal AFP(< 7 ng/mL).CONCLUSION Our results strongly support the value of miR-122 as potential biomarker of liver injury and probably prognosis. Nevertheless, the value of miR-122 in prediction of prognosis of HCC patients was limited to certain patients’ subgroups. Since circulating miR-122 may be influenced by impaired renal function, AFP and hemoglobin concentration, those factors need to be considered while interpreting miR-122 level.
出处 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS 2020年第1期86-96,共11页 世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版)
关键词 Hepatocellular carcinoma MicroRNA PROGNOSIS MicroRNA-122 Influencing factors Hepatocellular carcinoma MicroRNA Prognosis MicroRNA-122 Influencing factors
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献99

  • 1Njei B, Rotman Y, Ditah I, Lim JK. Emerging trends inhepatocellular carcinoma incidence and mortality. Hepatology2014; 61: 191-199[PMID: 25142309 DOI: 10.1002/hep.27388].
  • 2El-Serag HB, Kanwal F. Epidemiology of hepatocellular carcinomain the United States: Where are we- Where do we go- Hepatology2014; 60: 1767-1775 [PMID: 24839253 DOI: 10.1002/hep.27222].
  • 3Mittal S, El-Serag HB. Epidemiology of hepatocellular carcinoma:consider the population. J Clin Gastroenterol 2013; 47 Suppl:S2-S6 [PMID: 23632345 DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3182872f29].
  • 4Schütte K, Kipper M, Kahl S, Bornschein J, G-tze T, Adolf D,Arend J, Seidensticker R, Lippert H, Ricke J, Malfertheiner P.Clinical characteristics and time trends in etiology of hepatocellularcancer in Germany. Digestion 2013; 87: 147-159 [PMID: 23548687DOI: 10.1159/000346743].
  • 5Singal A, Volk ML, Waljee A, Salgia R, Higgins P, Rogers MA,Marrero JA. Meta-analysis: surveillance with ultrasound for earlystagehepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis. AlimentPharmacol Ther 2009; 30: 37-47 [PMID: 19392863 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.04014.x].
  • 6Singal AG, Conjeevaram HS, Volk ML, Fu S, Fontana RJ, AskariF, Su GL, Lok AS, Marrero JA. Effectiveness of hepatocellularcarcinoma surveillance in patients with cirrhosis. Cancer EpidemiolBiomarkers Prev 2012; 21: 793-799 [PMID: 22374994 DOI:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-1005].
  • 7Kim do Y, Han KH. Epidemiology and surveillance ofhepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Cancer 2012; 1: 2-14 [PMID:24159567 DOI: 10.1159/000339016].
  • 8Saffroy R, Pham P, Reffas M, Takka M, Lemoine A, DebuireB. New perspectives and strategy research biomarkers forhepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Chem Lab Med 2007; 45: 1169-1179[PMID: 17635075 DOI: 10.1515/CCLM.2007.262].
  • 9Bruix J, Sherman M. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma.Hepatology 2005; 42: 1208-1236 [PMID: 16250051 DOI: 10.1002/hep.20933].
  • 10Bruix J, Sherman M. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: anupdate. Hepatology 2011; 53: 1020-1022 [PMID: 21374666 DOI:10.1002/hep.24199].

共引文献48

同被引文献25

引证文献4

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部