期刊文献+

论“学者型作家”与“作家型学者” 被引量:6

On “Scholar-type Writer” and “Writer-type Scholar”
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章梳理了文学史上"学者型作家"与"作家型学者"的不同形态,剖析了现代大学文学教育的若干弊病,并结合当下"创意写作"学科的发展,提出"学术/创作"之间良性互动关系要注意的三个问题:一是要在"杂家"意义上,通过学术研究,拓展作家的眼界,增强创作的思想深度与广度;二是要警惕"头巾气"对创作的妨碍,不能让理念压倒感性体验,也不能让学问限制了文学想象力;三是从研究角度讲,对文学创作规律的尊重,有利于学者打破学科壁垒和学术偏见,养成"文学的同情",在文学审美能力的基础上,促进学术的进步。 This paper sorts out the different forms of "scholar-type writer" and "writer-type scholar" in history.The paper also analyses some disadvantages of literature education in the modern university system.Based on the current development of creative writing, this paper also puts forward three issues that should be paid attention to in the positive interaction between academic and creative writing.First, in the sense of "miscellaneous family", through academic research, we should broaden the writer’s horizon and enhance the depth and breadth of creative thinking.Second, we should be vigilant against the obstruction of "Bookworm" to creation. We should not let ideas overwhelm perceptual experience, nor let knowledge restrict literary imagination.Thirdly, from the research point of view, respecting the law of literary creation is conducive to breaking the disciplinary barriers and academic prejudices, fostering "literary sympathy" and promoting academic progress on the basis of literary aesthetic ability.
作者 房伟 FANG Wei
机构地区 苏州大学文学院
出处 《福建师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第6期124-129,171,共7页 Journal of Fujian Normal University:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献1

  • 1胡晓明.中国诗学之精神[M]江西人民出版社,1991.

共引文献1

同被引文献34

引证文献6

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部