期刊文献+

微创手术和传统开放手术治疗骨质疏松性脊柱压缩性骨折的临床效果比较 被引量:3

Clinical Comparison of Minimally Invasive Surgery and Traditional Open Surgery for Osteoporotic Spinal Compression Fractures
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对骨质疏松性脊柱压缩性骨折分别应用微创手术以及传统开放手术治疗,针对其起到的临床应用效果展开分析。方法本研究纳入的骨质疏松性压缩性骨折患者共有100例,纳入时间为2017年1月至2019年1月,结合患者的治疗方法差异分为A组和B组,A组接受微创手术治疗,B组接受传统开放手术治疗,将两组治疗后各项椎体指标展开对比。结果比较椎体指标包括椎体高度、椎体压缩率以及Cobb角,A组在以上各项指标均优于B组,P<0.05。结论对骨质疏松性脊柱压缩性骨折可以优先考虑采取微创手术治疗,其对椎体的改善情况更好,安全性高。 Objective To investigate the clinical application of osteoporotic spinal compression fractures by minimally invasive surgery and traditional open surgery.Methods A total of 100 patients with osteoporotic compression fractures were enrolled in this study.The time period was from January 2017 to January 2019.The patients were divided into group A and group B according to the difference of treatment methods.Group A received minimally invasive surgery,group B received traditional open surgery,the two groups of treatment after the vertebral indicators were compared.Results The vertebral body index including vertebral body height,vertebral compression rate and Cobb angle were compared.Group A was superior to group B in all the above indexes,P<0.05.Conclusion Minimally invasive surgery for osteoporotic spinal compression fractures is preferred,and the improvement of vertebral body is better and the safety is higher.
作者 郭勇 GUO Yong(Fengtai Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital,Beijing 100072)
出处 《智慧健康》 2019年第32期171-172,共2页 Smart Healthcare
关键词 微创手术 传统开放手术 骨质疏松性脊柱压缩性骨折 Minimally invasive surgery Traditional open surgery Osteoporotic spinal compression fracture
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献72

共引文献96

同被引文献42

引证文献3

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部