期刊文献+

9条目患者健康问卷抑郁量表在产后抑郁筛查中的应用价值 被引量:6

Application value of the 9-question depression scale from the patient health questionnaire in the screening of postpartum depression
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨9条目患者健康问卷抑郁量表(PHQ-9)在产后抑郁筛查中的应用价值。方法从2017年6月~2018年6月在我院住院分娩、并在产后42 d按医嘱回访的产妇中,随机选取362例作为研究对象,分别采用PHQ-9和爱丁堡产后抑郁量表(EPDs)评定其产后抑郁状况,以美国精神障碍诊断与统计手册(4版)轴I障碍定式临床检查患者版(SCID-I/P)的抑郁障碍诊断标准作为产后抑郁诊断标准。结果将两种量表的临界值分别界定为15分和13分时,PHQ-9对产后抑郁诊断的敏感度为84.88%,特异度为81.15%,阳性预测值为58.40%,阴性预测值为94.51%;EPDS对产后抑郁诊断的敏感度为80.23%,特异度为81.88%,阳性预测值为59.00%,阴性预测值为93.00%;PHQ-9对产后抑郁诊断的准确率为81.49%,EPDS对产后抑郁诊断的准确率为82.04%。两种量表特异度、敏感度、阴性预测值、阳性预测值及准确率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论与EPDS比较,PHQ适合于产后抑郁的筛查,可作为产后抑郁筛查的自评量表。 Objective To explore the application value of the 9-question depression scale from the patient health questionnaire(PHQ-9)in the screening of postpartum depression(PPD).Methods A total of 362 women within 42 days postpartum,who were delivered in our hospital from June 2017 to June 2018,were enrolled in this study.PHQ-9 and Edinburgh postpartum depression scale(EPDS)were used to assess their postpartum depression respectively.And the structured clinical interview for DSM-IV-TR axisⅠdisorders-patient edition(SCID-I/P)was regarded the standard for postpartum depression diagnosis.Results The cut-off score for PHQ-9 and EPDS was 15 and 13,respectively.Sensitivity of PHQ-9 was 84.88%,and specificity was 81.15%,with positive pretictive value of 58.40%,negative pretictive value of 94.51%.Sensitivity of EPDS was 80.23%,and specificity was 81.88%,with positive pretictive value of 59.00%,negative pretictive value of 93.00%.Accuracy of PHQ-9 was 81.49%,accuracy of EPDS was 82.04%.The Sensitivity,specificity,positive pretictive value,negative pretictive value and accuracy showed no statistical significant differece between PHQ-9 and EPDS(P>0.05).Conclusion Compared with EPDS,PHQ-9 is suitable for postpartum depression screening and can be used as a self-rating scale for postpartum depression screening.
作者 高明 王智慧 傅晓红 GAO Ming;WANG Zhi-hui;FU Xiao-hong(Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics,Suzhou Xiangcheng People′s Hospital,Jiangsu Province,Suzhou 215000,ChinaObjective)
出处 《中国当代医药》 2019年第32期104-106,共3页 China Modern Medicine
关键词 健康问卷抑郁量表 爱丁堡产后抑郁量表 产后抑郁 自评量表 Depression scale from the patient health questionnaire Edinburgh postnatal depression scale Postpartum depression Self-rating scale
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献38

  • 1李献云,费立鹏,张艳萍,王志青.抑郁症诊断筛查量表的编制及其效度检验[J].中国神经精神疾病杂志,2007,33(5):257-263. 被引量:35
  • 2吴海苏.社区老年期抑郁症相关问题的初步研究[D].复旦大学,2007,12-14.
  • 3罗阳,何国平.产后抑郁症相关性分析[J].中南大学学报(医学版),2007,32(3):460-465. 被引量:27
  • 4徐勇,吴海苏,徐一峰.病人健康问卷抑郁量表(PHQ-9)在社区老年人群中的应用——信度与效度分析[J].上海精神医学,2007,19(5):257-259. 被引量:176
  • 5Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB, et al. The Patient Health Questionnaire Somatic, Anxiety, and Depressive Symptom Scales: a systematic review [J]. Gen Hosp Psychiatry, 2010, 32(4): 345 - 359.
  • 6汤毓华.汉密顿抑郁量表(HamiltonDepressionRatingScaleforDepression,HRSD)[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1999,(增刊):220-223.
  • 7汤毓华.汉密顿抑郁量表(HamiltonDepressionRatingScaleforDepression,HRSD)[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1999,(增刊):220-223.
  • 8Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB. Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: the PHQ primary care study [ J]. JAMA, 1999, 282( 18): 1737 -1744.
  • 9Lecrubier Y, Sheehan DV, Weiller E, et al. The Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI). A short diagnostic structured interview: reliability and validity according to the CIDI [J]. Eur Psychiatry, 1997, 12(5) : 224 -231.
  • 10Sheehan DV, Lecrubier Y, Harnett Sheehan K, et al. The validity of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) accord- ing to the SCID-P and its reliability [J]. Eur Psychiatry, 1997, 12 (5) : 232 - 241.

共引文献184

同被引文献56

引证文献6

二级引证文献59

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部