期刊文献+

血尿酸与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后服用氯吡格雷患者血小板反应性的相关性研究 被引量:5

Association Between Uric Acid and Platelet Reactivity in Patients Treated With Clopidogrel Post Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评估血尿酸对行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后服用氯吡格雷患者血小板反应性的影响,以及整体患者和不同血尿酸水平患者中,血小板反应性与不良临床终点事件的相关性。方法:连续纳入2013年1月至12月于阜外医院行PCI的冠心病患者10 724例,排除无血栓弹力图者,研究最终纳入患者6 784例。高尿酸血症定义为男性血尿酸>7 mg/dl,女性>6 mg/dl。血小板高反应性(HTPR)定义为血栓弹力图腺苷二磷酸诱导的血小板-纤维蛋白凝块强度(TEG-MAADP)>47 mm。主要研究终点为主要不良心脑血管事件(MACCE)和出血。采用Logistic回归分析血小板反应性的影响因素,多因素Cox回归分析血小板反应性与长期预后的相关性。结果:6 784例患者中,1 406例(20.7%)患有高尿酸血症。2 073例(30.6%)患者存在HTPR,其中高尿酸血症患者447例(31.8%),非高尿酸血症患者1 626例(30.2%),高尿酸血症患者中HTPR发生率略高于非高尿酸血症患者,但差异无统计学意义。Logistic回归分析表明,校正基线混杂因素后,血尿酸水平不影响PCI后服用氯吡格雷患者的血小板反应性(HR=0.994,95%CI:0.951~1.039,P=0.790)。经随访2年后,Cox回归分析显示,校正基线混杂因素后,MACCE发生率在HTPR患者与非HTPR患者中差异无统计学意义(HR=0.97,95%CI:0.73~1.29,P=0.821),在高尿酸血症患者与非高尿酸血症患者中差异亦无统计学意义。然而,在高尿酸血症患者中,HTPR患者与非HTPR患者相比,其2年出血风险显著降低(HR=0.39,95%CI:0.17~0.92,P=0.030)。结论:尿酸水平与PCI后服用氯吡格雷患者的血小板反应性无明显相关;在高尿酸血症患者中,HTPR与远期出血风险降低相关。 Objectives:To evaluate the impact of uric acid(UA)on platelet reactivity,and long-term prognostic value of platelet reactivity in patients post percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI)and treated with clopidogrel.Methods:After excluding patients without thromboelastography(TEG)results,a total of 6 784 patients post PCI and treated with clopidogrel during January to December 2013 were enrolled in this study.All patients were followed up for 2 years.Hyperuricemia was defined as uric acid>7 mg/dl in male and>6 mg/dl in female.High on-treatment platelet reactivity was defined as TEG-ADP-induced platelet-fibrin clot strength(MAADP)>47 mm.The endpoints include major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events(MACCE)and bleeding.Logistic regression was used to evaluate risk factors for platelet reactivity.Multivariable Cox regression was used to evaluate the long-term prognostic effect of platelet reactivity.Results:There were 1 406 patients with hyperuricemia,and 5 378 patients with non-hyperuricemia.There were 2 073 patients with HTPR(30.6%).HTPR rate was 31.8%in hyperuricemia group and 30.2%in non-hyperuricemia group(P=0.259).Logistic regression showed that,after adjusted for confounding factors,uric acid level was not associated with platelet reactivity treated with clopidogrel(HR=0.994,95%CI:0.951-1.039,P=0.790).During the 2 years follow-up period,Cox regression analysis showed no difference between platelet reactivity and MACCE(HR=0.97,95%CI:0.73-1.29,P=0.821).While in patients with hyperuricemia,2-year bleeding risk was significantly lower in patients with HTRP than in patients with non-HTRP(HR=0.39,95%CI:0.17-0.92,P=0.030).Conclusions:UA is not associated with platelet reactivity in patients treated with dual antiplatelet therapy(DAPT)with clopidogrel after PCI.Platelet reactivity is associated with long-term bleeding risk in patients with hyperuricemia.
作者 蒋萍 宋莹 许晶晶 唐晓芳 姚懿 姜琳 王欢欢 赵雪燕 高展 陈珏 宋雷 高立建 张茵 杨跃进 高润霖 乔树宾 徐波 袁晋青 JIANG Ping;SONG Ying;XU Jingjing;TANG Xiaofang;YAO Yi;JIANG Lin;WANG Huanhuan;ZHAO Xueyan;GAO Zhan;CHEN Jue;SONG Lei;GAO Lijian;ZHANG Yin;YANG Yuejin;GAO Runlin;QIAO Shubin;XU Bo;YUAN Jinqing(Coronary Heart Disease Center,National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases and Fuwai Hospital,CAMS and PUMC,Beijing(100037),China)
出处 《中国循环杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2019年第7期658-663,共6页 Chinese Circulation Journal
基金 国家重点研发计划资助(2016YFC1301301) 国家自然科学基金(81770365)
关键词 血小板反应性 尿酸 氯吡格雷 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 platelet reactivity uric acid clopidogrel percutaneous coronary intervention
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献21

  • 1Gertler MM, Garn SM, Levine SA. Serum uric acid in relation to age and physique in health and in coronary heart disease. Ann Intern Med, 1951, 34: 1421-1431.
  • 2Luo ML, Lin XJ, Liu RC, et al. Dose-response relationship of Meta- analysis in the Stata software implementation. JEBM, 2014, 13: 182- 187.
  • 3Orsini N, Belloceo R, Greenland S. Generalized least squares for trend estimation of summarized dose-response data. Stata J, 2006, 6: 44-57.
  • 4Sterne J, Egger M. Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis:guidelines on choice of axis. J ClinEpidemiol, 2001, 54: 1046-1055.
  • 5Okura T, Higaki J, Kurata M, et al. Elevated serum uric acid is an independent predictor for cardiovascular events in patients with severe coronary artery steuosis subanalysis of the Japanese coronary artery disease (JCAD) study. Circulation, 2009, 73: 885-891.
  • 6Sinan Deveci O, Kabakci G, Okutucu S, et al. The association between serum uric acid level and coronary artery disease. Int J Clin Pract, 2010, 64: 900-907.
  • 7Zhang J, He L, Cao S, et al. Association of serum uric acid and coronary artery disease in premenopausal women. Plos One, 2014, 9: 106.
  • 8Moriarity JT, Folsom AR, Iribarren C, et al. Serum uric acid and risk of coronary heart disease: Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. Ann Epidemiol, 2000, 10: 136-143.
  • 9Bos MJ, Koudstaal PJ, Hofman A, et al. Uric acid is a risk factor for myocardial infarction and stroke the Rotterdam study. Stroke, 2006, 37: 1503-1507.
  • 10Holme I, Aastveit AH, Hammar N, et al. Uric acid and risk of myocardial infarction, stroke and congestive heart failure in 417- 734 men and women in the ApolipoproteinMortalityRISk study (AMORIS). J Intern Med, 2009, 266: 558-570.

共引文献36

同被引文献50

引证文献5

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部