期刊文献+

超声引导与传统解剖定位在臂丛神经阻滞麻醉中的比较 被引量:1

Comparison of Ultrasound Guidance and Traditional Anatomical Localization in Brachial Plexus Block Anesthesia
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对比分析超声引导与传统解剖定位在臂丛神经阻滞麻醉中的效果。方法将2016年1月—2018年11月该院实施臂丛神经阻滞麻醉的54例患者分为观察组和对照组,每组均27例,观察组患者应用超声引导定位,对照组采用传统解剖定位,对两组麻醉效果进行对比分析。结果观察组麻醉优良率为100.00%,显著高于对照组的81.48%,两组间数据差异有意义(χ~2=5.510,P=0.019),观察组患者的麻醉起效时间、麻醉完成时间、麻醉维持时间分别为(3.44±0.27)min、(3.25±0.17)min、(439.25±52.67)min,明显优于对照组(t=17.676、14.155、8.709,P=0.000);观察组并发症发生率7.41%,明显低于对照组的37.04%(χ~2=9.857,P=0.000)。结论在臂丛神经阻滞麻醉中,采用超声引导定位的效果更优于传统解剖定位,不仅能提高麻醉效果优良率,还可缩短麻醉起效时间和麻醉完成时间,延长麻醉维持时间,并能减少血肿、Honer综合征及气胸等并发症的发生。 Objective To compare the effects of ultrasound guidance and traditional anatomical localization in brachial plexus block anesthesia.Methods 54 patients who underwent brachial plexus block anesthesia from January 2016 to November 2018 were divided into observation group and control group,27 cases in each group.The observation group was guided by ultrasound and the control group was used traditional anatomical positioning to compare and analyze the anesthetic effects of the two groups.Results The excellent and good anesthesia rate of the observation group was 100.00%,which was significantly higher than that of the control group(81.48%).There was significant difference between the two groups(χ^2=5.510,P=0.019).The anesthesia onset time and anesthesia completion time,anesthesia maintenance time of the observation group was(3.44±0.27)min,(3.25±0.17)min,(439.25±52.67)min,which was significantly better than the control group(t=17.676,14.155,8.709,P=0.000);The incidence rate was 7.41%,which was significantly lower than 37.04%of the control group(χ^2=9.857,P=0.000).Conclusion In brachial plexus block anesthesia,the effect of ultrasound guided positioning is better than traditional anatomical positioning,which can not only improve the excellent rate of anesthesia,but also shorten the time of onset of anesthesia and the completion time of anesthesia,prolong the maintenance time of anesthesia,and it can reduce the occurrence of complications such as hematoma,Honer syndrome and pneumothorax.
作者 吴尚 周艳鸿 WU Shang;ZHOU Yan-hong(Department of Anesthesiology,Yuhua Hospital of Nanjing,Nanjing,Jiangsu Province,210012 China)
出处 《世界复合医学》 2019年第2期118-120,共3页 World Journal of Complex Medicine
关键词 超声引导 传统解剖定位 臂丛神经阻滞麻醉 效果 Ultrasound guidance Traditional anatomical localization Brachial plexus block anesthesia Effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献80

  • 1林惠华,张晓光,牛捷平,孙晓雄.不同浓度罗哌卡因用于腋路臂丛神经阻滞的研究[J].中国实用手外科杂志,2001,15(3):153-155. 被引量:17
  • 2周仁龙,Jian Hang,杭燕南.神经阻滞定位的临床进展[J].国外医学(麻醉学与复苏分册),2005,26(3):153-157. 被引量:9
  • 3陈开文,张传汉,罗敏,孙继领.神经刺激器在臂丛神经阻滞的应用[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2005,21(11):798-799. 被引量:16
  • 4李挺,吴道珠,徐旭仲,黄品同.上肢手术病人超声引导锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞的效果[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2006,26(2):126-129. 被引量:93
  • 5吴道珠,徐旭仲,李挺,黄品同,黄福光,吕夕明,杨琰,邹春鹏.高频超声对臂丛神经显像和定位的价值[J].中华超声影像学杂志,2006,15(6):449-452. 被引量:32
  • 6Fanelli G, Casati A,Garancini P,et al. Nerve stimulator and multiple injection technique for upper and lower limb blockade: failure rate,patient acceptance,and neurologic complications. Study Group on Regional Anesthesia. Anesth Analg, 1999,88 (2) : 847-852.
  • 7Chuan A,Tiong C,Maley M,et al.Decontamination of ultrasound equipment used for peripheral ultrasound guided regional anaesthesia.Anaesth Intensive Care,2013,41(4):529-534.
  • 8Fanelli G,Casati A,Beccaria P,et al.Interscalene brachial plexus anaesthesia with small volumes of ropivacaine 0.75%:effects of the injection technique on the onset time of nerve blockade.Eur J Anaesthesiol,2001,18(1):54-58.
  • 9Lonnqvist PA.Is ultrasound guidance mandatory when performing paediatric regional anaesthesia? Curr Opin Anaesthesiol,2010,23(3):337-341.
  • 10Tsui B,Suresh S.Ultrasound imaging for regional anesthesia in infants,children,and adolescents.Anesthesiology,2010,112(2):473-492.

共引文献172

同被引文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部