期刊文献+

论微信公众号“洗稿”作品著作权侵权判定 被引量:17

On copyright Infringement Judgment of WeChat Public Number "Manuscript" Works
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 在新媒体时代,微信公众号"洗稿"猖獗,严重侵犯著作权人的合法权益。"洗稿"作品不符合著作权中"独创性"要求,从法理而言,"洗稿"作品并非著作权法意义上的创作,而是一种"高级"剽窃。在司法实践中,应适用"接触+实质性相似"规则予以认定,将"整体观感法"与"抽象分离法"组合适用为"洗稿"作品的著作权侵权判定提供应对之策。 In the new media era, Wechat's public number "manuscript laundering" is rampant, which seriously infringes on the legitimate rights and interests of copyright owners. The work of "manuscript laundering" does not meet the requirement of "originality" in copyright. Jurisprudence, the work of "manuscript laundering" is not a creation in the sense of copyright law, but a kind of "advanced" plagiarism. In judicial practice, the rule of "contact + substantive similarity" should be applied to determine the copyright infringement of "manuscript laundering" works, and the combination of "overall perception law" and "abstract separation law" should be applied to provide countermeasures for the determination of copyright infringement of "manuscript laundering" works.
作者 谢晶 Xie Jing
出处 《电子知识产权》 CSSCI 2019年第3期52-58,共7页 Electronics Intellectual Property
基金 高等学校学科创新引智计划(111计划)资助 项目编号:B18058
关键词 微信公众号 洗稿 实质性相似 著作权侵权 Wechat Public Number Manuscript Laundering Substantive Similarity Copyright Infringement.
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献66

引证文献17

二级引证文献59

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部