期刊文献+

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related perforation: Management and prevention 被引量:21

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related perforation: Management and prevention
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP) is a procedure that can result in serious complications, and thus should be handled by a skilled endoscopist to minimize the risk of complications and to enhance the success rate. The incidence of ERCP-related complications is 5%-10%, most commonly involving post-ERCP pancreatitis and clinically significant post-endoscopic sphincterotomy bleeding. Although ERCP-related perforation has a relatively lower incidence of 0.14%-1.6%, this complication is associated with a high mortality rate of 4.2%-29.6%. A classification of perforation type based on the instrument that caused the perforation was recently described that we postulated could affect the implementation of perforation management. In the present article, an algorithm for management and prevention of ERCP-related perforations is proposed that is based on the perforation type and delay of diagnosis. Available evidence demonstrates that a delayed diagnosis and/or treatment of perforation re-sults in a poorer prognosis, and thus should be at the forefront of procedural consideration. Furthermore, this review provides steps and recommendations from the pre-procedural stage through the post-procedural evaluation with consideration of contributing factors in order to minimize ERCP-related complication risk and improve patient outcome. To avoid perforation, endoscopists must evaluate the risks related to the individual patient and the procedure and perform the procedure gently. Once a perforation occurs, immediate diagnosis and early management are key factors to minimize mortality. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP) is a procedure that can result in serious complications, and thus should be handled by a skilled endoscopist to minimize the risk of complications and to enhance the success rate. The incidence of ERCP-related complications is 5%-10%, most commonly involving post-ERCP pancreatitis and clinically significant post-endoscopic sphincterotomy bleeding. Although ERCP-related perforation has a relatively lower incidence of 0.14%-1.6%, this complication is associated with a high mortality rate of 4.2%-29.6%. A classification of perforation type based on the instrument that caused the perforation was recently described that we postulated could affect the implementation of perforation management. In the present article, an algorithm for management and prevention of ERCP-related perforations is proposed that is based on the perforation type and delay of diagnosis. Available evidence demonstrates that a delayed diagnosis and/or treatment of perforation re-sults in a poorer prognosis, and thus should be at the forefront of procedural consideration. Furthermore, this review provides steps and recommendations from the pre-procedural stage through the post-procedural evaluation with consideration of contributing factors in order to minimize ERCP-related complication risk and improve patient outcome. To avoid perforation, endoscopists must evaluate the risks related to the individual patient and the procedure and perform the procedure gently. Once a perforation occurs, immediate diagnosis and early management are key factors to minimize mortality.
出处 《World Journal of Clinical Cases》 SCIE 2014年第10期522-527,共6页 世界临床病例杂志
关键词 ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY PERFORATION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT Classification Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography Perforation Prevention Management Classification
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献14

  • 1Tae Hoon Lee,Byoung Wook Bang,Jee In Jeong,Hyung Gil Kim,Seok Jeong,Seon Mee Park,Don Haeng Lee,Sang-Heum Park,Sun-Joo Kim.Primary endoscopic approximation suture under cap-assisted endoscopy of an ERCP-induced duodenal perforation[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2010,16(18):2305-2310. 被引量:19
  • 2Anthony Yuen Bun Teoh,Frances Ka Yin Cheung,Bing Hu,Ya Min Pan,Larry Hin Lai,Philip Wai Yan Chiu,Simon Kin Hung Wong,Francis Ka Leung Chan,James Yun Wong Lau.Randomized Trial of Endoscopic Sphincterotomy With Balloon Dilation Versus Endoscopic Sphincterotomy Alone for Removal of Bile Duct Stones[J]. Gastroenterology . 2013
  • 3Yangyang Liu,Peizhu Su,Yinghao Lin,Siheng Lin,Kun Xiao,Pingyan Chen,Shengli An,Yang Bai,Fachao Zhi.Endoscopic sphincterotomy plus balloon dilation versus endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis: A meta‐analysis[J]. J Gastroenterol Hepatol . 2013 (6)
  • 4Rajeev Attam.Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for stone extraction: if, when, and for how long?[J]. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy . 2010 (6)
  • 5Rajeev Attam,Martin L. Freeman.Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation for large common bile duct stones[J]. Journal of Hepato - Biliary - Pancreatic Surgery . 2009 (5)
  • 6Tae Hyeon Kim,Hyo Jeong Oh,Chong Ju Im,Chang Soo Choi,Ji Hye Kweon,Young Woo Sohn.A Comparative Study of Outcomes Between Endoscope Sphincterotomy Plus Endoscope Papillary Large Balloon Dilatation and Endoscopic Sphincterotomy Alone in Patients with Large Extrahepatic Bile Duct Stones[J]. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy . 2009 (5)
  • 7Gun Young Hong,Sang Wook Park,Kang Seok Seo,Hyeongcheol Moon.Endoscopic Sphincterotomy Plus Large-Balloon Dilation Versus Endoscopic Sphincterotomy for Removal of Large Common Bile Duct Stones[J]. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy . 2009 (5)
  • 8Feng Liu,Feng Li,Ying Zhou,Meijuan Xi,Duowu Zou,Zhaoshen Li.Minor Endoscopic Sphincterotomy Plus Endoscopic Balloon Dilation Is An Effective and Safer Alternative for Endoscopic Sphincterotomy During ERCP in Patients with Peiampullary Diverticula and Bile Duct Stones[J]. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy . 2008 (5)
  • 9S. Misra,M. Dwivedi.Large-diameter balloon dilation after endoscopic sphincterotomy for removal of difficult bile duct stones[J]. Endoscopy . 2008 (03)
  • 10Jeung Ho Heo,Dae Hwan Kang,Hyo Jin Jung,Dae Sik Kwon,Jin Kwang An,Bo Suk Kim,Kyung Duk Suh,Sang Yong Lee,Joo Ho Lee,Gwang Ha Kim,Tae Oh Kim,Jeong Heo,Geun Am Song,Mong Cho.Endoscopic sphincterotomy plus large-balloon dilation versus endoscopic sphincterotomy for removal of bile-duct stones <ce:link locator="fx1"/>[J]. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy . 2007 (4)

共引文献34

同被引文献147

引证文献21

二级引证文献96

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部