期刊文献+

Predictive factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic colorectal surgery 被引量:53

Predictive factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic colorectal surgery
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 Every colorectal surgeon during his or her career is faced with anastomotic leakage(AL); one of the most dreaded complications following any type of gastrointestinal anastomosis due to increased risk of morbidity, mortality, overall impact on functional and oncologic outcome and drainage on hospital resources. In order to understand and give an overview of the AL risk factors in laparoscopic colorectal surgery, we carried out a careful review of the existing literature on this topic and found several different definitions of AL which leads us to believe that the lack of a consensual, standard definition can partly explain the considerable variations in reported rates of AL in clinical studies. Colorectal leak rates have been found to vary depending on the anatomic location of the anastomosis with reported incidence rates ranging from 0 to 20%, while the laparoscopic approach to colorectal resections has not yet been associated with a significant reduction in AL incidence. As well, numerous risk factors, though identified, lack unanimous recognition amongst researchers. For example, the majority of papers describe the risk factors for left-sided anastomosis, the principal risk being male sex and lower anastomosis, while little data exists defining AL risk factors in a right colectomy. Also, gut microbioma is gaining an emerging role as potential risk factor for leakage. Every colorectal surgeon during his or her career is faced with anastomotic leakage(AL); one of the most dreaded complications following any type of gastrointestinal anastomosis due to increased risk of morbidity, mortality, overall impact on functional and oncologic outcome and drainage on hospital resources. In order to understand and give an overview of the AL risk factors in laparoscopic colorectal surgery, we carried out a careful review of the existing literature on this topic and found several different definitions of AL which leads us to believe that the lack of a consensual, standard definition can partly explain the considerable variations in reported rates of AL in clinical studies. Colorectal leak rates have been found to vary depending on the anatomic location of the anastomosis with reported incidence rates ranging from 0 to 20%, while the laparoscopic approach to colorectal resections has not yet been associated with a significant reduction in AL incidence. As well, numerous risk factors, though identified, lack unanimous recognition amongst researchers. For example, the majority of papers describe the risk factors for left-sided anastomosis, the principal risk being male sex and lower anastomosis, while little data exists defining AL risk factors in a right colectomy. Also, gut microbioma is gaining an emerging role as potential risk factor for leakage.
出处 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS 2018年第21期2247-2260,共14页 世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版)
关键词 LAPAROSCOPIC COLORECTAL SURGERY COLORECTAL SURGERY Anastomotic leakage LAPAROSCOPY Risk factor RECTAL cancer Diverting STOMA Laparoscopic colorectal surgery Colorectal surgery Anastomotic leakage Laparoscopy Risk factor Rectal cancer Diverting stoma
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献12

  • 1B. Person,D. A. Vivas,S. D. Wexner.Totally laparoscopic low anterior resection with transperineal handsewn colonic J-pouch anal anastomosis for low rectal cancer[J]. Surgical Endoscopy . 2006 (4)
  • 2M. Degiuli,M. Mineccia,A. Bertone,A. Arrigoni,M. Pennazio,M. Spandre,M. Cavallero,F. Calvo.Outcome of laparoscopic colorectal resection[J]. Surgical Endoscopy . 2004 (3)
  • 3Sanjiv K. Patankar M.D., F.R.C.S.,Sergio W. Larach M.D.,Andrea Ferrara M.D.,Paul R. Williamson M.D.,Joseph T. Gallagher M.D.,Samuel DeJesus M.D.,Shekar Narayanan M.D..Prospective Comparison of Laparoscopic vs. Open Resections for Colorectal Adenocarcinoma Over a Ten-Year Period[J]. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum . 2003 (5)
  • 4M. Pera,S. Delgado,J.C. García-Valdecasas,M. Pera,A. Castells,J.M. Piqué,E. Bombuy,A.M. Lacy.The management of leaking rectal anastomoses by minimally invasive techniques[J]. Surgical Endoscopy . 2002 (4)
  • 5J. R. D. Tuson,W. G. Everett.A retrospective study of colostomies, leaks and strictures after colorectal anastomosis[J]. International Journal of Colorectal Disease . 1990 (1)
  • 6Sonoda T,Pandey S,Trencheva K,Lee S,Milsom J.Long- term complications of hand-assisted versus laparoscopic colectomy. Journal of the American College of Surgeons . 2009
  • 7Lipska MA,Bissett IP,Parry BR,Merrie AE.Anastomotic leakage after lower gastrointestinal anastomosis:men are at a higher risk. Anz Journal of Surgery . 2006
  • 8AA Veenhof,AF Engel,ME Craanen,S Meijer,ES Lange-de Klerk,DL Peet.Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision: a comparative study on short-term outcomes. A single-institution experience regarding anterior resections and abdominoperineal resections. Digestive Surgery . 2007
  • 9WS Lee,SH Yun,YN Roh,HR Yun,WY Lee,YB Cho,HK Chun.Risk factors and clinical outcome for anastomotic leakage after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. World Journal of Surgery . 2008
  • 10Guillou PJ,Quirke P,Thorpe H,et al.Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet,The . 2005

共引文献23

同被引文献297

引证文献53

二级引证文献336

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部