摘要
本文利用黄土高原区849户农户调查数据,在通过探索性因子分析法从行动信息、行动参与、行动组织和行动效果4个维度对农户集体行动参与程度进行测度的基础上,运用bootstrap有调节的中介作用检验方法,考察了土地流转面积、流转期限对农户水土保持措施实施行为的直接影响,以及土地流转面积、流转期限通过改变农户集体行动参与程度对水土保持措施实施行为的间接影响,并对农户集体行动参与程度影响水土保持实践过程中政府补贴的调节效应进行了检验。研究结果表明:(1)土地流转面积对修筑梯田、使用地膜和造林具有显著的正向影响,而对节水灌溉技术采用的影响并不显著;土地流转期限对以上4种措施的实施均有显著的正向影响。(2)集体行动在土地流转面积、流转期限影响农户修筑梯田、采用节水灌溉技术和接受政府补贴较少农户的造林活动中发挥正向中介作用,但在土地流转面积、流转期限影响农户地膜使用过程中的中介作用并不显著。(3)政府补贴在农户集体行动影响造林和节水灌溉技术采用过程中发挥调节效应,但在集体行动影响造林过程中的调节效应为负,在集体行动影响节水灌溉技术采用过程中的调节效应为正。
Based on the data collected from 849 rural households in the Loess Plateau of China,this article conduct an exploratory factor analysis to measure the degree of participation of farmers in collective action from the dimensions of information,participation,organization and effect of action.Through a bootstrap moderated mediation effect test,the study further examines the direct impact of area and period of land transfer on farmers’implementation of soil and water conservation measures,and the indirect impact of farmers’participation change in collective action on the implementation of soil and water conservation measures.It also verifies the moderation effect of government compensation to participation degree of collective action.The results show that,firstly,the area of land transfer has a significant direct impact on the utilization of terraced fields,plastic film and afforestation,but no direct impact on the adoption of water-saving irrigation techniques.The period of land transfer has a significant direct impact on the implementation of the four measures.Secondly,while collective action plays a positive mediating role for the factors of area and period of land transfer to affect farmers’use of terraced fields,water-saving irrigation technology and afforestation,it plays no significant mediating role to affect farmers to use plastic film.Thirdly,government compensation plays a significant moderating role for collective action to influence the implementation of afforestation and water saving irrigation technology,and the moderation effect is negative for afforestation yet positive for water saving irrigation technology.
出处
《中国农村经济》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第6期38-54,共17页
Chinese Rural Economy
基金
国家自然科学基金项目"西北地区农户现代灌溉技术采用研究:社会网络
学习效应与采用效率"(编号:71473197)
国家自然科学基金项目"集体行动对农户水土保持关联技术采用行为影响机制研究--以黄土高原区为例"(编号:71673223)
教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目"生产风险
生计策略与农户贫困脆弱性治理--以秦巴山区为例"(编号:17YJC790059)的阶段性成果
