摘要
本文对200例住院病人进行静脉穿刺两种拔针法对血管损伤的临床同体对照观察。结果表明,旧法组的疼痛率、皮下淤血率、血管变硬率明显大于新法组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),为临床推广应用新法,减轻血管损伤提供了依据。
Auto-control observations of venular injurious changes induced by two methods of needle-withdrawal in venipunctures on 200 in-patients indicated that the incidence of pain, subcutaneous blood stasis and venule hardening in the old needle-withdrawal method group was significantly higher than that in the new method group(P<0.01). Therefore this new needle-withdrawal method of venipuncture,i.e.,quick pulling out the needle prior to the pressing of a cotton stick, deserves to be popularized in order to alleviate venular injury in clinical practice.
出处
《泸州医学院学报》
1991年第2期89-91,共3页
Journal of Luzhou Medical College
关键词
静脉穿刺
拔针法
血管损伤
Injections, intravenous
Extract needles method
Blood vessels
Wounds and injuries
