期刊文献+

微创经椎间孔减压腰椎融合内固定术治疗腰椎退变性疾病的临床疗效分析 被引量:2

Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析腰椎退变性疾病者行微创经椎间孔减压腰椎融合内固定手术(MIS-TLIF)医治的临床疗效。方法对本院2012年12月至2017年12月收治腰椎退变性疾病60例患者临床资料加以分析,且依据不同医治方法分为两组,将行后路开放术治疗的30例患者作为对照组,将行MIS-TLIF治疗的30例患者作为研究组,比较两组手术指标、肌酸磷酸激酶水平和并发症。结果研究组出血量(244.20±30.11)ml和引流量(85.50±22.36)ml均比对照组少,手术用时(146.74±30.65)min比对照组长,下床活动的时间(2.30±0.21)d比对照组短(P<0.05);研究组手术后1天、3天、5天肌酸磷酸激酶水平均比对照组优,且总并发症率比对照组低(P<0.05)。结论腰椎退变性疾病者行MIS-TLIF医治可优化手术指标和肌酸磷酸激酶水平,且减少并发症发生。 Objective To analyze the clinical efficacy of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar fusion and internal fixation (MIS-TLIF) in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases. Methods The clinical data of 60 patients with degenerative lumbar degenerative disease from December 2012 to December 2017 were analyzed. According to different treatment methods, 30 patients were divided into two groups. 30 patients treated with posterior open surgery were used as control group. Thirty patients who underwent MIS-TLIF treatment were included in the study group. The surgical parameters, creatine phosphokinase levels and complications were compared between the two groups. Results The bleeding volume (244.20±30.11) ml and drainage volume (85.50±22.36) ml were lower in the study group than in the control group. The time of operation (146.74±30.65) min was longer than that of the control group, and the time of getting out of bed (2.30±0.21)d The control group was shorter than the control group at 1 day, 3 days, and 5 days after surgery, and the total complication rate was lower than that of the control group (P〈0.05). Conclusion MIS-TLIF treatment for lumbar degenerative diseases can optimize surgical parameters and creatine phosphokinase levels and reduce complications.
作者 王化明 Wang Huaming(The Second Department of Orthopaedics,Center Hospital of Xinwen Mining Group Co.,LTD.,Tai'an,Shandong 271200,China)
出处 《当代医学》 2018年第34期91-93,共3页 Contemporary Medicine
关键词 腰椎退变性疾病 后路开放术 MIS-TLIF 并发症 Lumbar degenerative diseases Posterior open surgery MIS-TLIF Complications
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献68

  • 1Yofimitsu E, Chiba K, Toyama Y, et al. Long-term outcomes of stand- ard discectomy for lumbar disc herniation : a follow-up study of more than 10 years[J]. Spine,2001,26(6) :652-657.
  • 2Burns BH. An operation for spondylolistheals [ J ]. Lancet, 1933,221 (5728) :1233.
  • 3Lane JD, Moore ES. Transperitoneal approach to the intervertebral disc in the lumbar area[ J]. Ann Su, 1948,127(3 ) :537-551.
  • 4O' Bnen JP. The role of fusion for chronic low back pain [ J ]. Orthop Clin North Am, 1983,14 (5) :639-642.
  • 5Suk SI, Lee CK, Kim WJ, et al. Adding posterior lumbar interbody fu- sion to pedicle screw fixation and posterolateral fusion after decom- pression in spondylolytie spondylolisthesis [ J ]. Spine, 1997,22 ( 2 ) : 210-220.
  • 6Faithank JC, Prnsent PB. The Oswestry Disability Index [ J ]. Spine, 2000,25 (22) :2940-2952.
  • 7Matron JC, Abla A, Bost J. Association between peridural scar and persistent low back pain after lumbar discectomy [ J ]. Meuml Res, 1999,21 ( suppl 1 ) :43-46.
  • 8Ross JS, Roberston JT, Frederickson RC, et al. Tribolet N. Association between peridural scar and recurrent radicular pain after lumbar dis- cectomy : magnetic resonance evaluation [ J ]. Neumsurgery, 1996,38 (4) :855-863.
  • 9Cbo CB, Ryu KS, Park CK. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion with stand-alone interbody cage in treatment of lumbar intervertebral fo- raminal stenosis : comparative study of two different types of cages [J]. J Korean Neurosurg Soc,2010,47(5) :352-357.
  • 10Jiang SD, Chen JW, Jiang LS, et al. Which procedure is better for lumbar interbody fusion : anterior lumbar interbody fusion or transfo- raminal lumbar interbody fusion? [ J ]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2012,132(9) :1259-1266.

共引文献63

同被引文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部