摘要
新《行政诉讼法》将行政协议纳入到行政诉讼受案范围,使行政协议的理论研究和审判实践上升到一个新的高度,但司法解释将行政协议的范畴限定在"法定职责范围内",未将行政机关超越法定职权签订的协议纳入行政协议的范围。本文认为,协议的依据不应限于正式法源,应包括公共政策等非正式法源,协议应为实现行政管理目的而签订。因此,有必要通过立法及最高人民法院判例的方式,逐步实现法定职责外行政协议的类型化和法定化,从而在实现政府行政管理协商共治的同时,提高相对人对行政行为的合理预期。
The new Administrative Procedure Law brings the administrative agreement into the scope of accepting cases in administrative litigation,which makes the theoretical research and trial practice of the administrative agreement rise to a new height.However,the judicial interpretation limits the scope of the administrative agreement within the scope of＂statutory responsibilities＂,and does not include the agreement signed by the administrative organ beyond the statutory authority into the administrative agreement range.This paper holds that the basis of the agreement should not be limited to formal sources of law,but should include informal sources of law such as public policy.The agreement should be signed for the purpose of administrative management.Therefore,it is necessary to gradually realize the typification and legalization of administrative agreements beyond statutory responsibilities through legislation and the Supreme People＇s Court precedents,so as to improve the reasonable expectations of the counterparts for administrative acts while realizing the Co-governance of government administration through consultation.
作者
张祺炜
金保阳
Zhang Qiwei;Jin Baoyang
出处
《行政与法》
2018年第9期100-107,共8页
Administration and Law
关键词
法定职责
行政协议
行政管理
statutory duties
administrative agreements
administrative management
