期刊文献+

腹腔镜肾部分切除术治疗巨大囊实性肾占位(附5例报告) 被引量:1

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for giant cystic solid renal masses: with a report of 5 cases
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨腹腔镜肾部分切除术治疗巨大囊实性肾占位的临床疗效及安全性。方法:回顾分析2018年4~7月为5例直径≥7 cm的巨大囊实性肾占位患者行腹腔镜肾部分切除术的临床资料,其中2例行经腹腹腔镜肾部分切除术,3例行经腹膜后肾部分切除术;男4例,女1例,平均(39.8±12.1)岁,肾占位最大径平均(7.6±0.7) cm,术前肌酐平均(88.6±16.9)μmol/L。分析手术时间、热缺血时间、术中出血量、切缘阳性率、住院时间、并发症情况及术后病理结果、肾功能恢复等情况。结果:5例均顺利完成腹腔镜肾部分切除术。手术时间平均(226±32) min,热缺血时间平均(41.6±8.8) min,术中出血量平均(256±227) mL,术后平均住院(6.6±0.8) d。术后第8天1例患者出现肾周血肿。病理结果示透明细胞癌3例、多房囊性肾瘤1例、肾结核肉芽肿性炎1例。术后1周血肌酐平均(99.6±18.9)μmol/L,与术前相比差异无统计学意义。结论:具备丰富手术经验的术者,腹腔镜肾部分切除术治疗巨大囊实性肾占位安全、可行,近期疗效显著,围手术期肾功能无明显变化。 Objective : To investigate the efficacy and safety of laparoseopie partial nephreetomy for giant cystic solid renal mas- ses.Methods:Retrospective analysis was made on the clinical data of 5 patients,who suffered fl'om giant cystic solid renal masses with diameter more than 7 em and underwent laparoseopie partial nephreetomy from Apr.2018 to Jul.2018,ineluding 2 eases of transabdomi- nal laparoseopie partial nephreetomy and 3 eases of retroperitoneal partial nephreetomy.There were 4 males and 1 female with the mean age of ( 39.8± 12.1 ) years old, and the mean largest diameter of renal mass was ( 7.6± 0.7 ) cm, preoperative ereatinine was ( 88.6± 16.9) μmol/L.The operation time, warm isehemia time, intraoperative blood loss, positive margin rate, hospitalization time, complications,postoperative pathological results and renal function recovery were analyzed.Results:Laparoseopie partial nephreetomy was sue- eessfully performed in all 5 eases.The mean operation time was (226± 32)min, the mean warm isehemia time was (41.6±8.8)min, the mean intraoperative blood loss was (256±227)mL,the average postoperative hospital stay was (6.6±0.8)d.One patient had postopera- tive complication and perirenal hematoma occurred on the 8th day after surgery.Postoperative pathology included 3 eases of clear cell carcinoma, 1 ease of multiloeular cystic renal tumor,and 1 ease of renal tuberculosis granulomatous irdlammation.Serum ereatinine was (99.6± 18.9) μmol/L at 1 week after operation, and there was no significant difference compared with preoperative ereatinine.Conclusions:For experienced surgeons, laparoseopie partial nephreetomy is safe and feasible for the treatment of giant cystic solid renal masses.There is no significant change in renal function during perioperative period, the short-term efficacy is outstanding.
作者 宁定龙 蔡燚 王睿哲 童时宇 陈敏丰 齐琳 NING Ding-long;CAI Yi;WANG Rui-zhe(Department of Urology,Xiangya Hospital,Central South University,Changsha 410008,China)
出处 《腹腔镜外科杂志》 2018年第8期581-584,共4页 Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery
关键词 囊实性肾占位 肾部分切除术 腹腔镜检查 Cystic solid renal masses Partial nephreetomy Laparoseopy
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献41

  • 1汪朔,李奇孟,夏丹,张志根,沈柏华,金百冶,陈戈明,方丹波,谢立平,蔡松良,史时芳,魏克湘.后腹腔镜下肾部分切除术23例报告[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2006,27(7):439-442. 被引量:27
  • 2Patard J J, Shvarts O, Lam J S, et al. Safety and effi- cacy of partial nephrectomy for all T1 tumors based on an international multicenter experience [J]. J Urol, 2004, 171(6 Pt 1): 2181-2185.
  • 3Van Poppel H. Efficacy and safety of nephron-sparing surgery[J]. IntJ Urol, 2010, 17(4): 314-326.
  • 4Barlow L J, Korets R, Laudano M, et al. Predicting renal functional outcomes after surgery for renal corti- cal tumours., a multifactorial analysis [J]. BJU Int, 2010, 106(4): 489-492.
  • 5Pignot G, Bigot P, Bernhard J C, et al. Nephron-spar- ing surgery is superior to radical nephreetomy in pre- serving renal function benefit even when expanding in- dications beyond the traditional 4-cm cutoff[J]. Urol Oncol, 2014, 32(7): 1024-1030.
  • 6Pertia A, Managadze L, Chkhotua A. The value of nephron-sparing surgery for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma 4 to 7 cm in size[J]. Georgian Med News, 2012, (212): 7-12.
  • 7Kutikov A, Uzzo R G. The R. E. N. A.L. nephrome- try score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth[J]. J Urol, 2009, 182(3): 844-853.
  • 8Wright J L, Porter J R. Laparoscopic partial nephrec- tomy: comparison of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches[J]. J Urol, 2005, 174(3) : 841-845.
  • 9Desai M M, Strzempkowski B, Matin S F, et al. Pro- spective randomized comparison of transperitoneal ver- sus retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy [J]. J Urol, 2005, 173(1):38-41.
  • 10Taue R, Izaki H, Koizumi T, et al. Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrecto- my: a comparative study[J]. Int J Urol, 2009, 16(a) : 263-267.

共引文献30

同被引文献3

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部