摘要
我国立法对申请财产保全规定了提起复议和损害赔偿诉讼两种救济措施,以保障被申请人的权益。复议制度在保全裁定作出后提出;申请财产保全错误损害赔偿诉讼属于侵权责任之诉。由于法律规定较为笼统,司法实践中如何操作存在较大区别。复议制度由于设计缺陷形同虚设,申请财产保全错误损害赔偿纠纷案件的处理也面临诸多困难。保障保全前被申请人参与权,在保全期间发挥复议制度的作用并建立保全撤销制度,同时对保全解除后的申请财产保全错误损害赔偿制度进行细化规定,才能充分保障被申请人合法权益,完善财产保全申请错误救济制度。
Our country＇s legislation provides two remedies for applying for reconsideration and compensation for damages in relation to the application for property preservation,and to protect the respondents＇ right. The reconsideration system is proposed after the protection ruling is made; applying for property preservation error damages litigation belongs to the liability for tort. Due to the general legal provisions,there are some differences in judicial practice. The fact that the design of the reconsideration system is inconsistent with the use of design defects,so the handling of disputes concerning the application of property preservation and damage compensation disputes is also faced with many difficulties. In order to fully protect the legitimate rights and interests of the respondent. Improve the property remedy application error relief system. We need to protect the respondent＇s participation right before security protection,to play the role of the reconsideration system during the preservation period and establish the protection revocation system,and to make detailed provisions for the system of false protection of property preservation after the completion of preservation.
作者
孙文晴
胡尚慧
SUN Wenqing;HU Shanghui(School of Law, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China;People＇s Court of Huangshi District, Taizhou Zhejiang 318020, China)
出处
《中州大学学报》
2018年第2期56-60,共5页
Journal of Zhongzhou University
关键词
财产保全
损害赔偿
过错责任原则
救济制度
property preservation
compensation for damages
principle of liability for fault
relief system
