期刊文献+

临床药师干预作用对医院药品不良反应监测与上报的影响 被引量:11

Effect of Clinical Pharmacist Intervention on Adverse Drug Reaction Monitoring and Reporting in Our Hospital
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评价临床药师干预作用对医院药品不良反应(ADR)监测与上报的影响。方法:对我院2007~2016年间药品不良反应监测上报情况进行回顾性分析。以2014年临床药师干预ADR上报为时间界限,比较临床药师干预前后,我院ADR报告总数,新的、严重的ADR报告数与比例,新的ADR判定错误比例;以及ADR上报来源变化。结果:干预后,ADR报告数,严重ADR报告数及其比例,以及新的ADR的报告数及其比例均较干预前显著增加(P<0.05),新的ADR判定错误比例则较前明显降低(P<0.05)。干预后药师上报ADR比例较前明显增加(P<0.05)。结论:临床药师干预ADR监测报告,使我院ADR监测报告数量及质量均得到明显提高。 Objective:To evaluate the effect of the intervention by clinical pharmacists on the monitoring and reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADR) in our hospital. Methods:the report of adverse drug reaction monitoring in our hospital during the past 2007-2016 years was reviewed. The year 2014 was a cut-off line, sine in this year the clinical pharmacist intervened in ADR reporting. The total number of ADR reports, the number of new and severe ADR reports and the errors proportion of new ADR, and the sources change of reported ADR were compared before and after the intervention of clinical pharmacists. Results:After the intervention, the total number of ADR reports, the number and proportion of severe ADR reports, and the number and proportion of new ADR were significantly increased compared with those before intervention (P 〈 0.05 ) , and the error proportion of new ADR was significantly lower than before (P 〈 0.05). The percentage of ADR reported by pharmacists increased significantly (P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion : The intervention by clinical pharmacists had improved the quantity and quality of ADR monitoring and reporting work in our hospital.
作者 童莹慧 丁海樱 陈凌亚 黄萍 Tong Yinghui, Ding Haiying, Chen Lingya, Huang Ping(Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou 310022, Chin)
出处 《药物流行病学杂志》 CAS 2018年第4期233-235,248,共4页 Chinese Journal of Pharmacoepidemiology
基金 浙江省药学会医院药学科研基金项目奥赛康医院药学科研专项(编号:2014ZYY14)
关键词 临床药师 干预 药品不良反应 监测 报告 Clinical pharmacists Intervention Adverse drug reaction Monitoring Reports
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献53

  • 1杜文民,王永铭,程能能.药品不良反应的判定与其研究方法(续完)[J].中国药物警戒,2005,2(1):11-13. 被引量:27
  • 2王雪敏,黄守坚.安慰剂和安慰剂效应[J].新医学,1996,27(12):663-665. 被引量:5
  • 3Emanueli A, Sacchetti G. An algorithm for the classification of untoward events in large scale clinical trials[ J]. Agents Actions Suppl, 1980,7:318.
  • 4Venulet J, Ciucci A, Bemeker G C. Standardised assessment of drugZadverse reaction associations : rationale and experience [ J ]. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol, 1980,18 : 381.
  • 5Jones J K. Adverse drug reactions in the community health set- ting:approaches to recognizing, counseling, and reporting [ J] . Faro Community Health, 1982,5:58.
  • 6Wiholm B E. The Swedish drug-event assessment methods: spe- cial workshop-regulatory [ J ]. Drug Inf J, 1984,18:267.
  • 7Karch F E, Lasagna L Toward the operational identification of ad- verse drug reactions[ J]. Clin Pharmacol Ther,1977 ,21:247.
  • 8Naranjo C A, Busto U, Sellers E M, et al. A method for estimating the probability of adverse drug reactions [ J ] . Clin Pharmacol Tber,30(2) :239.
  • 9Benichou C, Danan G, Flahault A. Causality assessment of ad- verse reactions to drugs: II. An original model for validation ofdrug causality assessment methods:case reports with positive re- challenge [ J ]. J Clin Epidemiol, 1993,46 : 1331.
  • 10Hoskins R E, Mannino S. Causality assessment of adverse drug re- actions using decision support and informatics tools [ J 1. Phar- macoepidemiol Drug Saf, 1992,1:235.

共引文献125

同被引文献97

引证文献11

二级引证文献46

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部