摘要
为探讨一期根治术治疗肛周脓肿的临床疗效,将2013年3月至2016年12月我科收治的200例肛周脓肿患者随机分为观察组和对照组,各100例,观察组予一期根治术治疗,对照组予单纯切开引流术治疗,对比2组患者临床总体疗效、感染控制时间及疗程.结果显示,观察组总有效率（950.%）明显高于对照组（81.0%）,P〈0.05;观察组感染控制时间[（3.17±0.64）d]明显短于对照组[（5.98±1.07）d],P〈0.05;观察组疗程[（21.58±2.83）d]明显短于对照组[（29.40±3.39）d],P〈0.05.结果表明,与切开引流术相比,一期根治术治疗肛周脓肿有效率更高,疗程更短,患者痛苦更小,临床应用价值更高.
This study was to explore the clinical effect of primary radical procedure for perianal abscess, randomly divided 200 cases of perianal abscess admitted in author＇s department from Mar. 2013 to Dec. 2016 into observation group and control one, 100 cases for each,which the former received primary radical procedure, meanwhile the latter only received incision drainage; then compared both group＇s whole effects,infection-controlled time and treatment course. As results, in total effective rate, in infection-controlled time,and treatment course the former was respectively higher（95.0% vs 81.0%）,shorter [（3.17± 0.64） d vs （5.98±1.07） d],and shorter[（21.58±2.83） d vs （24.40±3.39） d],the difference was significant（all, P 〈0.05）.Results show that compared with incision ＆ drainage primary radical procedure for perianal abscess has such merits as higher effect, shorter treatment course and milder pain of patients, thus higher clinical application value.
出处
《中国肛肠病杂志》
2017年第11期56-57,共2页
Chinese Journal of Coloproctology
关键词
肛周脓肿
一期根治术
切开引流术
效果
Perianal abscess
Primary radical procedure
Incision ＆ drainage
Efficacy
