摘要
通知是认定电商平台是否存在过错以及是否就损害结果的扩大部分承担连带责任的条件。司法实践中,关于有效通知的判断标准存在较大争议。为了明确裁判规则、统一判断标准,最高人民法院第83号指导案例明确规定了有效通知的法律要件:被侵权人的身份情况、权属凭证、侵权人网络地址、侵权事实初步证据等内容,具有很高的指导价值。但是,该法律要件仍有进一步完善的余地:应明确通知的民事法律行为属性及其推定效力,通知的主体是专利权人或者利害关系人,通知可以采取书面或者口头形式,初步证据应按照一般法律常识能足以证明专利侵权行为的存在。
Effective notification is a condition to determine whether there is fault on electronic business platform, and whether it should bear joint and several liability for improper expansion of the consequences of damage. In judicial practice, there is a great deal of controversy about the criterion of effective notification. Therefore, it is necessary to study the legal requirements that an effective notifcation should have. The Supreme People’s Court No. 83 guiding case clearly defined legal requirements of effective notification should include identifcation of the infringed, ownership certifcate, the network address of the infringer, preliminary evidence and other contents, which are very helpful. However, there are still rooms for further improvements： civil juristic act attributes of notifcation should be clear and defnite, the notifcation should be constructive, the notifcation can be in written or oral form, the main body of the notifcation can be the patentee or any interested party, preliminary evidence in accordance with the general legal knowledge can prove the existence of patent infringement.
出处
《知识产权》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第1期59-66,共8页
Intellectual Property
基金
教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目规划基金项目"通知移除规则在电商平台专利侵权中的适用研究"(项目编号:17YJA820033)的阶段性成果
关键词
电商平台
专利侵权
有效通知
形式要件
实质要件
electronic business platform
patent infringement
effective notification
substance requirement
formal requirement
