期刊文献+

磁共振灌注加权成像定量参数在外周带前列腺癌鉴别诊断中的价值 被引量:1

Value of Quantitative Parameters of MR Implantation Weighted Imaging in Differential Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨外周带前列腺癌鉴别诊断中磁共振灌注加权成像(PWI)定量参数的价值。方法:回顾性分析2014年1月至2015年10月在濮阳市安阳地区医院行前列腺磁共振(MRI)扫描的前列腺疾病患者50例,分析PWI定量参数在前列腺癌及良性鉴别上的价值。结果:前列腺癌组、良性病变组转运常数(K^(tras))、血液回流常数(K_(ep))比较,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);血管外细胞外间隙体积百分数(Ve)比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:在前列腺外周带前列腺癌鉴别诊断中,PWI定量参数K^(tras)、K_(ep)具有重要的诊断价值,可作为鉴别的重要参数指标。 Objective To evaluate the value of magnetic resonance perfusion weighted imaging(PWI) quantitative parameters in the differential diagnosis of prostate cancer. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 50 cases of prostate cancer patients with prostate cancer in the hospital of Anyang, Puyang City, and analyzed the value of PWI quantitative parameters in prostate cancer and benign identification. Results The difference of K^tras and Kep between prostate cancer group and benign lesion group was statistically significant(P〈0.05). Ve, the difference was not statistically significant(P〈0.05). Conclusion In the differential diagnosis of prostate cancer in the prostate, the quantitative parameters of PWI K^tras and Kep have important diagnostic value and can be used as an important parameter index.
作者 祝丽敏
出处 《深圳中西医结合杂志》 2017年第19期59-60,共2页 Shenzhen Journal of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine
关键词 磁共振 灌注加权成像 前列腺癌 Magnetic resonance imaging Perfusion weighted imaging Prostate cancer
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献41

  • 1张继斌,沈钧康,许建铭,李晓兵,须同禄,刘仁坚,陆之安.MR弥散加权成像在前列腺良恶性病变诊断中的价值初探[J].中国医学影像技术,2004,20(11):1732-1734. 被引量:18
  • 2周桥.前列腺癌Gleason分级[J].中华病理学杂志,2005,34(4):240-243. 被引量:44
  • 3Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, et al. Global cancer statistics. CA: a cancer iournal for clinicians, 2011, 61(2): 69-90.
  • 4Barentsz JO, Richenberg J, Clements R, et al. ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012. European radiology, 2012, 22(4): 746-757.
  • 5Li C, Chen M, Li S, et al. Detection of prostate cancer in peripheral zone: comparison of MR diffusion tensor imaging, quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, and the two techniques combined at 3.0 T. Acta radiological, 2014, 55(2): 239-247.
  • 6Tamura C, Shinmoto H, Soga S, et al. Diffusion kurtosis imaging study of prostate cancer: preliminary findings. Journal of magnetic resonance imaging: JMRI, 2014, 40(3): 723-729.
  • 7Quentin M, Pentang G, Schimmoller L, et al. Feasibility of diffusional kurtosis tensor imaging in prostate MR/for the assessment of prostate cancer: preliminary results.Magnetic resonance imaging, 2014, 32(7): 880-885.
  • 8Fukuoka D. Computer-aided diagnosis on the field of head and neck: development and current trends.Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi, 2013, 69(11): 1313-1319.
  • 9Dromain C, Boyer B, Ferre R, et al. Computed-aided diagnosis (CAD) in the detection of breast cancer.European journal of radiology, 2013, 82(3): 417-423.
  • 10Sung YS, Kwon HJ, Park BW, et al. Prostate cancer detection on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: computer-aided diagnosis versus single perfusion parameter maps. AJR American journal of roentgenology, 2011,197(5): 1122-1129.

共引文献111

同被引文献2

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部