摘要
目的比较DIY热牙胶充填系统与冷牙胶充填对慢性根尖周炎治疗的临床效果。方法选取我院2015年6月~2016年6月收治的100例慢性根尖周炎患者,随机分为治疗组和对照组,各50例。治疗组患者进行DIY热牙胶充填治疗,对照组采取冷牙胶充填治疗。比较两组治疗方法的充填时间、根管填充效果、术后治愈率和术后疼痛发生率。结果两组的充填效果比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗组的充填时间短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗组的术后6个月治愈率(92%)和术后疼痛发生率(6%)均明显优于对照组的74%和22%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论与冷牙胶充填治疗相比,DIY热牙胶根管充填用于慢性根尖周炎治疗的疗效确切,不良反应少,值得在临床中进一步推广。
Objective To compare the effect of heat gutta-percha filling system and cold gutta-percha filling system in the treatment of chronic periapical periodontitis.Methods 100 cases of chronic periapical periodontitis in our hospital from June 2015 to June 2016 were selected and randomly divided into the treatment group and the control group,50 patients in each group.The treatment group was treated with heat gutta-percha filling system,and the control group was treated with cold gutta-percha filling system.The difference of filling time,root filling effect,cure rate and postoperative pain rate between the two groups were compared.Results There was no significant difference between the two groups in the filling effect （P〉0.05）.The filling time of the treatment group was shorter than that of the control group,with significant difference （P〈0.05）.After 6 months,the cure rate （92%） and the incidence rate of postoperative pain （6%） of the treatment group were significantly better than that of the control group （74%,22%）,with significant difference （P〈0.05）. Conclusion Compared with gutta-percha filling treatment,the effect of DIY heat gutta-percha filling in the treatment of chronic periapical periodontitis is more effective,and less adverse reactions,which is worthy of promoting in clinic.
出处
《中国当代医药》
2017年第32期99-101,共3页
China Modern Medicine
关键词
DIY热牙胶充填
冷牙胶充填
慢性根尖周炎
根管充填
Warm gutta-percha obturation
Cold gutta-percha obturation
Chronic periapical periodontitis
Root-canal filling
