摘要
周汝昌在《红楼梦》研究中围绕曹雪芹家世巨细靡遗的考证,在处理小说人物事件与清代史实的考证上建构了自己的体系,虽然不少发现值得推崇,但将所有小说人物事件都归纳为影射当朝政治和宫廷人物事件,未免太过牵强。其中以恭王府为大观园原型的观点即存断章取义、以传言为事实之嫌。通过对周氏观点所持依据、恭王府历史沿革以及各种传说附会的梳理辨析,力图澄清谬解,还原本真,对红学研究的健康发展起到一些积极意义。
With painstaking researches into Cao Xueqin＇ s family background and social relations, Zhou Ruchang put forward his theories and formed a unique system on the basis of looking into Cao＇ s descriptions of characters and inci- dents in the novel and their allusions to historical facts in Qing Dynasty. A considerable number of Zhou＇ s findings that concern A Dream in Red Mansions are plausible; however, indiscriminately summarizing that all novelistic characters al- lude to contemporary monarchs and authorities is farfetched. Regarding Prince Gong＇ s Mansion as the prototype of the Grand View Garden is a display of Zhou＇s out-of-context interpretation and it is very likely that he had taken hearsay or rumors for facts. This article tries to dispel misinterpretations and clarify the actual situations by analyzing the grounds on which Zhou built his arguments, the historical evolution of Prince Gong＇ s Mansion and a series of interpretations. It will hopefully have a positive impact on the development of researches on A Dream in Red Mansions.
出处
《沧州师范学院学报》
2017年第3期25-27,共3页
Journal of Cangzhou Normal University
关键词
周汝昌
恭王府
大观园
谬说
Zhou Ruchang
Prince Gong＇ s Mansion
the Grand View Garden
fallacy
