期刊文献+

静脉声学造影与经阴道彩色多普勒超声诊断子宫内膜息肉价值的比较 被引量:39

Comparison of intravenous contrast-enhanced ultrasound and transvaginal color Doppler sonography in diagnosis
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的通过与经阴道彩色多普勒超声(transvaginal color doppler sonography,TVCD)诊断结果进行对比,探讨静脉声学造影(intravenous contrast-enhanced ultrasound,CEUS)对子宫内膜息肉(endometrium polyps,EPs)的诊断价值。方法 85例可疑EPs病例以病灶直径10 mm为界分为2组,先后行TVCD、CEUS检查;病理证实后,将两结果进行比较。结果 2组造影诊断EPs敏感度分别为82.8%、94.1%,特异度分别为90.9%、72.7%,诊断符合率分别为85.0%、88.9%,明显高于TVCD,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);CEUS检查中56例与病理结果相符,53例灌注方式呈离心型,3例呈整体型;时间-强度曲线分析2组病灶间各参数差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 CEUS是临床检查EPs的良好手段。 Objective To evaluate the value of intravenous contrast-enhanced ultrasound in diagnosis of endometrial polyps (EPs) by comparison with transvaginal color Doppler sonography (TCVD).Methods Eighty five cases were studied by Transvaginal color doppler sonography and intravenous contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), respectively, confirmed by pathology and comparing the two results.Results In the two groups of CEUS, the sensitivity was 82.8%, 94.1%, specificity was 90.9%, 72.7%, the diagnostic coincidence rate was 85.0%, 88.9%, all of these were higher than those of TVCD group, there was significant differences between two methods(P〈0.05).56 cases conformed to the pathological diagnosis, 53 cases showed the enhancement pattern was centrifugal enhancement, 3 cases was overall enhancement, intensity appeared variously.The difference of start time, peak time, and clear time between EPs and endometria were no significant difference between two groups each other(P〉0.05).Conclusion CEUS is valuable in diagnosis EPs.
出处 《首都医科大学学报》 CAS 北大核心 2017年第4期620-625,共6页 Journal of Capital Medical University
关键词 经阴道彩色多普勒超声 静脉声学造影 子宫内膜息肉 transvaginal color Doppler sonography (TVCD) intravenous contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) endometrial polyps(EPs)
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献89

共引文献107

同被引文献281

引证文献39

二级引证文献328

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部