摘要
目的研究分析脑干梗死诊断使用脑干听觉诱发电位(BAEP)检测的临床价值。方法选取2014年1月—2015年1月我院的30例脑干梗死患者作为观察组,为患者提供头颅CT、MRI、BAEP检查,对三种检查方式的阳性率进行分析。选取30例健康体检者作为对照组,对两组的BAEP检测情况进行比较分析。结果此次研究中,BAEP检测的阳性率为83.33%,MRI检测的阳性率为56.67%,CT检测的阳性率为46.67%,BAEP阳性率要比其他两项检测方式高,三组结果对比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组患者Ⅲ波及Ⅴ波潜伏期(PL),Ⅰ~Ⅲ波及Ⅲ~Ⅴ波峰间潜伏期(IPL)延长同对照组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论脑干听觉诱发电位检查能够应用于脑干梗死患者的检查,其敏感性高,为早期诊断提供了良好的参考信息。
Objective To investigate the clinical value of brainstem auditory evoked potential （BAEP） in the diagnosis of brainstem infarction.Methods From January 2014 to January 2015, 30 patients with brain stem infarction in our hospital were selected as the observation group, and the head, CT, MRI and BAEP examinations were performed for the patients.The positive rates of three kinds of examinations were analyzed.30 healthy subjects were selected as the control group, and the BAEP detection in the two groups was compared and analyzed. Results in this study, the positive rate of BAEP detection was 83.33%, the positive rate of MRI detection was 56.67%, the positive rate of CT detection was 46.67%, the positive rate of BAEP was higher than the other two detection methods, results of three groups had statistical difference （P 〈 0.05）.The patients in the observation group had Ⅲ and Ⅴ peak latency （PL）, and inter-peak latency （IPL） between Ⅰ and Ⅲ or Ⅲ and Ⅴ , compared with the control group, the difference was statistically significant （P 〈 0.05）. Conclusion Brainstem auditory evoked potential examination can be applied to the examination of brain stem infarction patients, and its sensitivity is high, which provides a good reference for early diagnosis, and deserves to be popularized.
出处
《中国卫生标准管理》
2017年第17期50-51,共2页
China Health Standard Management
关键词
脑干梗死
脑干听觉诱发电位
检测
brainstem infarction
brainstem auditory evoked potential
detection
