摘要
司法实践中,对于损益相抵规则的理解不同,出发点不一,在法律适用上呈现散乱甚至冲突状态。其原因在于有的是根据完全赔偿理论,有的是根据惩罚预防说作为损益相抵规则的依据,其虽然得到一定程度的承认,但都缺乏完整统一性,不能体现私法关系当事人之间联系的直接性。损益相抵不在于是否足额赔偿或惩罚赔偿,核心在于是否符合矫正正义下的损害赔偿基本原理以及受害人收到的利益是否是侵权人矫正自己不公行为。
In the judicial practice, due to the different understanding of the rules of profit and loss and the starting point ,the application of law is scattered and even conflicted. The reason is mainly based on the theory of complete compensation,some according to the theory of penalty prevention as the basis for the profit and loss balance rules, although a certain degree ofrecognition, but the lack of integrity and unity, can not reflect the private law relations between the parties directly. The profitand loss is not whether the full compensation or Penalties, the core is consistent with the basic principles of corrective and theinterests of the victim is correcting their injustice.
出处
《齐鲁学刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第3期105-111,共7页
Qilu Journal
关键词
损益相抵
完全赔偿
惩罚预防
矫正正义
profit and loss offset
full compensation
penalty prevention
corrective justice
