摘要
2014年我国多地知识产权法院相继成立,对知识产权司法保护具有里程碑意义。回顾知识产权法院试点运行的情况,反思其中的不足,如"案多人少"矛盾未解决,技术调查官制度有待完善,相应法律法规、配套设施不完善,案件管辖审级未突破原有框架,确权程序冗长。美、德、日知识产权审判机构的运行为我国提供了丰富的经验,我国应积极探索知识产权上诉法院制度,科学合理地完善技术调查官制度,解决确权程序冗长问题。
It is a landmark for judicial protection of Intellectual Property that Intellectual Property Courts have been established in Beijing,Shanghai and Canton in 2014. Reviewing the operation of Intellectual Property Courts,we could rethink the deficiencies. For example,there are too many cases existing in the court,but few people are able to deal with them. Finally the cases are still not solved. Technical ombudsman system needs to be improved; Relevant laws,regulations and facilities are inadequate; the trial stage does not break the existing framework,and the procedure for admit rights is too long. The operation of intellectual property court in America,Germany and Japan provides rich experience with China,China should actively explore Intellectual Property Court of appeal and improve technology ombudsman system in a scientific and rational way,thus,China will solve the problem of long procedure to admit rights effectively.
出处
《河南司法警官职业学院学报》
2016年第4期79-83,共5页
Journal of Henan Judicial Police Vocational College
基金
国家哲学社会科学基金项目"专利无效判定的行政与司法博弈研究"(项目编号:13CFX090)
法治湖南建设与区域社会治理协同创新中心平台建设阶段性成果之一
关键词
知识产权法院
循环诉讼
技术调查官
知识产权上诉法院
Intellectual Property Court
circl suit
technical inquisitor
Intellectual Property Court for Appeal
